The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Jordan Peterson cucks
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:25 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home https://youtu.be/a8zLcMGCedA (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676832) |
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:26 PM Author: Claret macaca roast beef this guy has always been a faggot
ljl at any man named “Jordan” |
 |
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:34 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home He's 180 apart from his racial blindspot. He has done a lot of good but you can't be the spokesman for the truth and ignore race by conflating standard deviation and median. This is what he has done in the past with his platitude that differences between groups are smaller than differences within groups. A typically rational guy with well reasoned arguments turns into a bumbling fool when he tries to tip toe around the race issue (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676928) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:46 PM Author: Drab Aromatic Office "differences between groups are smaller than differences within groups"
how on earth could anybody think this is relevant to the race realist argument |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:54 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home i gather his argument is that by virtue of this fact, one must judge everyone as an individual because their racial identity doesn't tell us anything (much?) about them. it's an absurd argument and contradictory to his arguments about the distinctions between men and women where the same things apply (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34677094) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:57 PM Author: Drab Aromatic Office tbf everyone should be judged as an individual but the fact that particular bell curves are spread wider than the gap between the bell curves themselves is 1) obvious and 2) not refutative of redpill theory in any way (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34677134) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 3:05 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home they should be judged as individuals but in some contexts such as in regards to immigration, it is impossible since it's impossible to individually judge the unborn future descendants of the immigrants. this is but one justification for so-called white nationalist positions (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34677204) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:32 PM Author: Costumed puppy cuck I'd be willing to wager that the IQ gap between the progeny of 120 IQ parents and 80 IQ parents is significant, and at least as great as the gap between, e.g., whites and non-white latinos. If that's true, even in an immigration context and worrying about future progeny, it makes perfect sense to judge people as individuals instead of only judging them by racial/ethnic groupings. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678574) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 6:02 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home not every immigrant is screened for competence. some immigrate by marriage, family reunification, lottery, for "diversity" or illegally and then are granted amnesty later on. in some cases, group identity is the highest resolution image we can take of them (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678900) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:29 PM Author: Costumed puppy cuck It's not absurd to judge each person as an individual, nor is it contrary to anything I've heard JP say about men/women. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678551) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:59 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home it's absurd to argue that because judging people individually provides more information than judging them in groups that we can't say anything about people as groups. he rightly notices the average differences between men and women but refuses to acknowledge the average differences between different races (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678866) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:23 PM Author: Dull dragon reading party wait, does he seriously push lewontin's fallacy....? i wasn't aware of that. that's.....kind of pathetic.
IMO i think it's pretty clear that peterson deliberately steers clear of race realism/calling out the jew machine because he wants to continue to cash in on his newfound socioeconomic success. honestly it's hard to hold it against the guy. he's had a pretty rough career, and up until his big break in the past few years, he did pretty poorly for himself socioeconomically.
he's still doing a great service helping many young people improve their lives and form more healthy views of the world. |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:26 PM Author: sepia hell love of her life Fair (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678060) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:32 PM Author: Mischievous property also they're just dying to associate him with racism and the "far right" (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678577) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:29 PM Author: sepia hell love of her life “Listen, I’m aware that I’m a total hypocrite but... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676873) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:30 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home Ljl at him using "irony" instead of hypocrisy to describe their actions (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676891) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:31 PM Author: sepia hell love of her life I’ve always been skeptical of this guy but that was a total Jew move (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676903) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:38 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home Cr this Jewish slight of hand is good enough to fool the bulk of his audience but anyone above 120 IQ can see that the university canceling the event about the stifling of free speech was ironic because it proved the speakers' point, whereas the speakers' disinvitation of a guest because they didn't like what she said was hypocritical because it's supposedly exactly what they are against (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676967) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:41 PM Author: diverse adulterous locale Well, if you want to get technical about it, they dis-invited her because of something she didnt say (push back even a little bit on the podcast). That is not quite hypocrisy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676985) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:51 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home This is a distinction without a difference. You can't say you support the freedom to say what you want but impose positive obligations on that speech. That is no longer free speech and leads to logical absurdities. For example in this situation, it follows logically from your reasoning that it was unacceptable from Peterson's perspective for this chick to sit in silence but would not have been unacceptable for her to voice her agreement with the supposedly controversial views. That reasoning implies that peterson advocates for mandated speech which he has explicitly spoken out against on numerous occasions including bill c-16 and the ontario law society's diversity statement. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34677060) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:28 PM Author: Comical splenetic brethren fat ankles lol, C-16
Hope they make him call some genderless blob their preferred pronoun: "daddy" |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:51 PM Author: sepia hell love of her life (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678285) |
|
Date: November 14th, 2017 2:16 AM Author: heady indian lodge absolutely devastating. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34682294) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:25 PM Author: Comical splenetic brethren fat ankles (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678057) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:01 PM Author: sienna crackhouse Absolutely Devastating (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678369) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:01 PM Author: sienna crackhouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678368) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:39 PM Author: frozen space i would like to see this guy debate mark kingwell at U of T (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676974) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:40 PM Author: diverse adulterous locale I think it is pretty clear that it was a hard decision on his part which was a really close call. In another video, I think with Dave Rubin, he talks about Faith and what she did in more detail. He was mostly positive on what she had done but he fleshed more fully out that he still believes she had a positive obligation to actually question them on something at some point in the podcast. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34676978) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:29 PM Author: Comical splenetic brethren fat ankles sounds like fraudnonsense (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678091) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:45 PM Author: Underhanded liquid oxygen I can't watch that link right now, but in one of the bazillion YouTube videos out there, he says that he chooses not to speak about some topics because it would undermine the good work he can do with others. That might be the sort of calculation he's making here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34677021) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 2:55 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home his own personal cowardice should not serve as the justification for punishing others' speech (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34677108) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:30 PM Author: Comical splenetic brethren fat ankles *Won't stand against "de-platforming" of others* *expects others to stand for him*
panel is garbage, hope libs don't let them speak again |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:16 PM Author: vivacious impressive nursing home (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34677966) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:18 PM Author: Comical splenetic brethren fat ankles just saw the panel at 0:50, this vid is going to be 180 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34677991) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:49 PM Author: Curious Mildly Autistic People Who Are Hurt Corner Lol at this racist who hasn't showered in a week asking a question
Lol at you dumb racists questioning the intellectual powerhouse Jordan Peterson
Lol at you xo nazis protecting some journalist hack. |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 4:55 PM Author: sienna crackhouse jfc, WLMAS (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678313) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:17 PM Author: sienna crackhouse He made his opposition to "Nazis" one of the major parts of the toolkit he uses to fight his critics, in part because SJWs reflexively call anyone they do not like a "Nazi". It's a sad disingenuous circus on both sides.
Lately, he was dragging alone that SJW-cannibalized SJW faggot Bret Weinstein. Watch JP say nothing after Weinstein, salivating in a narcissistic masturbatory glee, announces there are no IQ differences between races,
https://youtu.be/0cLLFSdKZLI?t=1934 |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:31 PM Author: Comical splenetic brethren fat ankles says: 'atheletic, but no moral/intellectual also, EQUALITY at birth'
niggers should have stomped this faggot out at Evergreen, humanity must now suffer his (((lies))) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:31 PM Author: 180 kitchen sex offender Longtime fan of Peterson. Not happy about this. Bad to pull an invite that was already accepted. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678564) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:32 PM Author: Comical splenetic brethren fat ankles u still a fan bro? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34678569) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 5:46 PM Author: 180 kitchen sex offender Yea.
I'm not a fan of everything about the guy. I'm a staunch atheist and think his religious stuff is back. But what's tough about this is that it strikes to a major point of what I specifically value about Peterson |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 8:43 PM Author: sienna crackhouse (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34680197) |
|
Date: November 13th, 2017 8:53 PM Author: heady indian lodge he doesnt want to be associated with nazis. and i bet he would shut them down if he could. problem is, a lot of what he says is what they say. lol @ that faggot. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34680279) |
|
Date: November 14th, 2017 2:06 AM Author: lemon cuckoldry Are you people morons? Do you think he wants to risk career and personal sjuicicd by giving shitlibs racism grenades to throw at him (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34682264) |
|
Date: November 14th, 2017 2:44 AM Author: talented boiling water sound barrier He went too far here. I don't dislike Peterson, but it's clear his shtick is never gonna amount to anything. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3795875&forum_id=2#34682333) |
|
Date: November 14th, 2017 2:51 AM Author: talented boiling water sound barrier The problem with Peterson is that he peddles the same "radical individualism" shit that cucks like Sargon preach. I don't like how he tries to paint Christianity as fundamentally individualist. It's really not when you study it in context. Neocons used to do the same thing (eg, "Judeo-Christian" values, interpreting Aquinas as some kind of proto-classical liberal).
More importantly, classical liberalism might seem edgy and salient when you're like 19, but it's ultimately just as much of a dead end/meme as white nationalism. The problem with cultural marxism isn't that it's "collectivist" or "moral authoritarianism". The problem is its exploitation of atomized western thought for nefarious ends. Peterson thinks you can treat the symptoms of cancer without removing the tumor. |