\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Fun Legal Hypo (4 Jews Chase After $20 Bill) - from Talmud Law Class

moishe, shlomo, dudi and yehuda *were* friends. as the we...
flickering purple twinkling uncleanness
  11/17/17
RULING: moishe wins. the rule is that property is acquired b...
flickering purple twinkling uncleanness
  01/05/18
moishe because he ended up with it. this hypo reminds me a ...
odious pink space faggotry
  11/17/17
180 for thinking of that. they split the baby in the end? so...
flickering purple twinkling uncleanness
  11/17/17
yeah they split the baby.
odious pink space faggotry
  11/17/17
yep, they split the baby
Overrated Masturbator
  01/05/18
Lol at Jews practicing the Rule of Capture with currency.
hot death wish
  11/17/17
...
flickering purple twinkling uncleanness
  11/19/17
like capturing land, foot on the note is stake in ground.
Indecent multi-billionaire stead
  11/19/17
They are to split it evenly and donate to charity
Lime talking meetinghouse
  11/19/17
lol
Indecent multi-billionaire stead
  12/03/17
AIPAC
Olive menage brethren
  12/03/17
This actually happened that there’s a rule for this? I’m vot...
Stirring judgmental casino philosopher-king
  12/03/17
...
Indecent multi-billionaire stead
  12/03/17
yes this was an actual case.
flickering purple twinkling uncleanness
  01/05/18
Yehuda got screwed here, IMO. I'd give it to him.
citrine base round eye
  01/05/18
he got screwed bc he put his foot on it? it's like the baseb...
flickering purple twinkling uncleanness
  01/05/18
These “legal” hypos bring significant enlightenment as to wh...
Stirring judgmental casino philosopher-king
  01/05/18
...
Hideous institution
  01/05/18
call me a dumb goy, but to me it's enough
citrine base round eye
  01/05/18
Because we had a concept of livery of seisin while the Jews ...
Stirring judgmental casino philosopher-king
  01/05/18
Traditionally, a thief must not only gain dominion over the ...
Hideous institution
  01/05/18
Larceny has a mens rea of intent to deprive. Slightly differ...
Stirring judgmental casino philosopher-king
  01/05/18
IMO, ownership contains the right to do nothing with your pr...
citrine base round eye
  01/05/18
...
Slate medicated kitty cat crackhouse
  01/05/18
the guy who took it out of moshe's pocket when moshe was for...
pale field jap
  01/05/18
hmm, I think either shlomo and moishe should share it. obvio...
Lascivious azn
  01/05/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: November 17th, 2017 2:00 PM
Author: flickering purple twinkling uncleanness

moishe, shlomo, dudi and yehuda *were* friends.

as the were walking home from the yeshiva, moishe commented that he thought he saw money on the other side of a busy street.

shlomo said that he definitely could see it, and it was a 100 shekel note [~$20] and it belonged to him because he saw it first.

dudi ran across the street and was the first person to get within a 6-ft. range of the note, however yehuda was able to put his foot on the note.

moishe quickly snatched the money from under yehuda's foot and put it in his pocket.

who is entitled to the 100 shekels?

NOTE: this actually happened. this isn't a hypo.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34710549)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 3:25 PM
Author: flickering purple twinkling uncleanness

RULING: moishe wins. the rule is that property is acquired by moving it in some direction as a symbolic act of the transaction -- up down left right etc. e.g., if someone gives you the keys to a house in a real estate deal, the transaction is finalized when you move the key. one cant acquire property by falling on it. you actually have to move it. yehuda putting his foot on the note didnt acquire it. moishe picking it up is what acquired it. seeing the note is totally irrelevant here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089020)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 17th, 2017 2:01 PM
Author: odious pink space faggotry

moishe because he ended up with it. this hypo reminds me a whole lot of this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Popov_v._Hayashi

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34710557)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 17th, 2017 2:06 PM
Author: flickering purple twinkling uncleanness

180 for thinking of that. they split the baby in the end? so it was just a ttt CA superior court decision? would have been cool if the CA SCOTUS ruled on this and we had some real scholarship.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34710616)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 17th, 2017 2:07 PM
Author: odious pink space faggotry

yeah they split the baby.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34710624)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 5:26 PM
Author: Overrated Masturbator

yep, they split the baby

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089991)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 17th, 2017 2:06 PM
Author: hot death wish

Lol at Jews practicing the Rule of Capture with currency.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34710609)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 19th, 2017 12:22 AM
Author: flickering purple twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34721345)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 19th, 2017 12:27 AM
Author: Indecent multi-billionaire stead

like capturing land, foot on the note is stake in ground.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34721371)



Reply Favorite

Date: November 19th, 2017 1:10 AM
Author: Lime talking meetinghouse

They are to split it evenly and donate to charity



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34721568)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 3rd, 2017 5:39 AM
Author: Indecent multi-billionaire stead

lol

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34826794)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 3rd, 2017 5:54 AM
Author: Olive menage brethren

AIPAC

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34826806)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 3rd, 2017 7:00 AM
Author: Stirring judgmental casino philosopher-king

This actually happened that there’s a rule for this? I’m voting for possession by foot with a 10% finders fee to the guy who alerted them all to the presence of the note.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34826846)



Reply Favorite

Date: December 3rd, 2017 7:02 AM
Author: Indecent multi-billionaire stead



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#34826848)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 3:31 PM
Author: flickering purple twinkling uncleanness

yes this was an actual case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089056)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 3:29 PM
Author: citrine base round eye

Yehuda got screwed here, IMO. I'd give it to him.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089046)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 3:31 PM
Author: flickering purple twinkling uncleanness

he got screwed bc he put his foot on it? it's like the baseball analogy. if someone puts their foot on a baseball, is that enough? i can see how it's not.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089055)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 4:34 PM
Author: Stirring judgmental casino philosopher-king

These “legal” hypos bring significant enlightenment as to why Jews have been persecuted and why our profession is a shit profession.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089611)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 4:37 PM
Author: Hideous institution



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089635)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 4:36 PM
Author: citrine base round eye

call me a dumb goy, but to me it's enough

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089627)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 4:48 PM
Author: Stirring judgmental casino philosopher-king

Because we had a concept of livery of seisin while the Jews apparently require you to manipulate the property somehow.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089734)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 5:00 PM
Author: Hideous institution

Traditionally, a thief must not only gain dominion over the property, but also must move it from its original position. The slightest movement, a hair's breadth, is sufficient.[23] However, the entirety of the property must be moved. As LaFave noted critically this requirement is the difference between rotating a doughnut (larceny) and rotating a pie (not larceny),[24] as all of the doughnut is moved through rotation while the pie's exact center remains in the same place when rotated. The movement must also be an actual asportation, rather than movement in preparation.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089800)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 5:05 PM
Author: Stirring judgmental casino philosopher-king

Larceny has a mens rea of intent to deprive. Slightly different context.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089840)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 5:04 PM
Author: citrine base round eye

IMO, ownership contains the right to do nothing with your property. requiring property to be used is counter to the very idea of property rights.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089832)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 4:38 PM
Author: Slate medicated kitty cat crackhouse



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089643)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 4:52 PM
Author: pale field jap

the guy who took it out of moshe's pocket when moshe was forced to strip down and head to the shower

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089761)



Reply Favorite

Date: January 5th, 2018 5:11 PM
Author: Lascivious azn

hmm, I think either shlomo and moishe should share it. obviously moishe has it and he needs to get it. but shlomo got nothing for spotting the $$$ and not giving anything to schlomo discourages future people from spotting money, which is socially desirable.

remember that this might have never even happened if schlomo didn't see the $$$

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800740&forum_id=2#35089871)