Explain to me again why a "Flat Tax" is unfair? Thank
| pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/17/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/19/17 | | Bright pocket flask dilemma | 11/19/17 | | glittery walnut milk | 11/19/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | sadistic passionate office | 11/21/17 | | sticky whorehouse | 11/21/17 | | Mischievous Lodge Goyim | 11/21/17 | | avocado balding space | 11/21/17 | | pearl sneaky criminal wagecucks | 11/21/17 | | chartreuse vengeful partner | 11/21/17 | | magenta sweet tailpipe | 11/21/17 | | fighting liquid oxygen brunch | 11/19/17 | | disrespectful sooty house | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | disrespectful sooty house | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | disrespectful sooty house | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | Hairraiser Property | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | disrespectful sooty house | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | laughsome purple box office bbw | 11/21/17 | | Lascivious grizzly rehab | 11/21/17 | | clear depressive indian lodge | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | Lascivious grizzly rehab | 11/21/17 | | Dashing Blathering National Private Investor | 11/21/17 | | Splenetic theatre | 11/21/17 | | fragrant parlor stain | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | Soul-stirring orchid library community account | 11/21/17 | | Naked Center | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | fighting liquid oxygen brunch | 11/21/17 | | Silver razzmatazz sanctuary wrinkle | 11/21/17 | | cracking hell | 11/21/17 | | Indigo potus karate | 11/21/17 | | cracking hell | 11/21/17 | | Naked Center | 11/21/17 | | Indigo potus karate | 11/21/17 | | Startling Crackhouse Main People | 11/21/17 | | Godawful supple black woman | 11/21/17 | | Thriller orchestra pit | 11/21/17 | | Startling Crackhouse Main People | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | Thriller orchestra pit | 11/21/17 | | Startling Crackhouse Main People | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | Startling Crackhouse Main People | 11/21/17 | | razzle-dazzle prole mother | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | Effete bearded friendly grandma | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | cracking hell | 11/21/17 | | razzle-dazzle prole mother | 11/21/17 | | cracking hell | 11/21/17 | | Naked Center | 11/21/17 | | cracking hell | 11/21/17 | | Naked Center | 11/21/17 | | cracking hell | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | cracking hell | 11/21/17 | | Vivacious chestnut locus associate | 11/21/17 | | Naked Center | 11/21/17 | | Vivacious chestnut locus associate | 11/21/17 | | fighting liquid oxygen brunch | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | fighting liquid oxygen brunch | 11/21/17 | | Thriller orchestra pit | 11/21/17 | | razzle-dazzle prole mother | 11/21/17 | | Naked Center | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | mind-boggling salmon gaping corn cake | 11/21/17 | | pink titillating really tough guy heaven | 11/21/17 | | Indigo potus karate | 11/21/17 | | Effete bearded friendly grandma | 11/21/17 | | Indecent contagious coldplay fan stage | 11/21/17 | | fighting liquid oxygen brunch | 11/21/17 | | Provocative ratface forum | 11/21/17 | | geriatric range | 11/21/17 | | Startling Crackhouse Main People | 11/21/17 | | Effete bearded friendly grandma | 11/21/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 3:12 PM Author: disrespectful sooty house
I provided a standard shitlib response for entertainment purposes only.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Hall-Rabushka tax would be highly regressive, in part because high-income households tend to consume less of their income than lower-income households and because investment income would not be taxed (or rather double-taxed).
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34741089)
|
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 3:21 PM Author: geriatric range
fair enough on your first point
but why bring up a consumption tax when we are talking about income tax? and just because 'tend' exists, a flat tax on consumption is still a flat tax.
investment income should be taxed as income. it is income. that aspect of hall rabushka is fairly considered regressive because it treats different types of income differently, by definition, to the wealthier peoples' benefits
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34741173)
|
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:50 PM Author: Naked Center
I'm not taking it that far. It is entirely plausible, for example if taking $200 from a poor just means they can't afford oxy for the next little while vs. taking $200 from a UMC means he isn't gonna enroll his kids in soccer camp.
Let me be clear, I can also formulate many examples going the other way. I just don't like utility arguments like that because unless we are talking about the taking away of basic necessities (we are not) then its a stupid way to approach things.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744697) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:04 PM Author: Startling Crackhouse Main People
IF you believe in an income tax, THEN that tax should tax labor.
Gains in earnings for high income individual generally does not come from labor. Too often, these individuals gain income from capital, not labor.
Special interests will never let this happen, but tcr tax plan would be 0% up to $150k, ~20% up to 500k, and ~70% thereafter. This stat doesn't get pushed hard enough, but we could have 95% of this country pay jack shit and just tax the fuck out of the super rich. The idea that $60k earners should spend a week doing taxes to write an $8k check is absurd.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744403) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:33 PM Author: Startling Crackhouse Main People
Yeah, that's absurd. Not even worth the time to fill out the form, have the government look things over, and deal with collections of back taxes.
And just LOL at the logic that not having skin in the game, or the threat of a higher rate, stopping someone from earning more. 10 out of 10 people will choose to earn more and pay more under ANY tax code.
I'm a huge Trumpmo and the plan in my OP is tcr populist solution.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744569) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:07 PM Author: razzle-dazzle prole mother
its not unfair but impractical
there is no good flat tax rate to use unless you are willing to either destroy the federal govt or the poor/lower middle class people
set it too low to not affect the poor/lower middle class and you wont raise enough revenue. set it too high and you are going to make life miserable for people making < 60K or so
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744428) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 9:20 PM Author: mind-boggling salmon gaping corn cake
Chris Rock summed it up best talking about alimony
"if you make 30 million and the bitch want 15, that's fine you ain't starvin. but if you make 30 thousand and the bitch want half, you just might have to kill her!"
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744487) |
Date: November 21st, 2017 10:03 PM Author: Startling Crackhouse Main People
*gets paid 80k in stock options*
One weird trick hehe
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3800962&forum_id=2#34744797) |
|
|