The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
libs finding out body cams are bad for criminals, may need to shut | it | down
| Histrionic toaster | 11/18/17 |
| provocative indian lodge | 11/18/17 |
| plum jewess | 11/18/17 |
| Razzle-dazzle Hairy Legs | 11/18/17 |
| Histrionic toaster | 11/18/17 |
| Gold cruel-hearted market roommate | 11/18/17 |
| Chartreuse nowag | 11/18/17 |
| Appetizing friendly grandma | 11/18/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:18 PM Author: Histrionic toaster sometimes it's hard to tell when libs are lying and when they're insane. did they really think cams would make police officers look worse and nigs look better? who knows but it's certainly problematic now: https://www.teamupturn.org/reports/2017/the-illusion-of-accuracy "Despite common misperceptions, camera footage is not inherently more objective or more reliable than other evidence. It shows one perspective of an incident — a perspective that is not identical to the officer’s perspective. Footage can be limited by the camera’s angle, field of view, and other factors." |
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:20 PM Author: provocative indian lodge It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incidentIt shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident It shows one perspective of an incident |
 |
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:21 PM Author: plum jewess (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801853&forum_id=2#34718858) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:22 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle Hairy Legs lol so not even taping sex with a womyn can protect you from false claim.... (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801853&forum_id=2#34718861) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:23 PM Author: Histrionic toaster ?
stop privileging the narrative of your camera over zher lived experience u bigot |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:29 PM Author: Gold cruel-hearted market roommate (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801853&forum_id=2#34718935) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:20 PM Author: Chartreuse nowag Lol libs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3801853&forum_id=2#34718854) |
|
Date: November 18th, 2017 5:24 PM Author: Appetizing friendly grandma i mean, it is true that the body cam can only record what the camera takes in, and in that sense there may be material off-camera action, but LJL at the retarded argument that this makes the camera recording plus testimony about off-camera action less objective than just testimony about the entire incident.
"a perspective that is not identical to the officer’s perspective."
are they now suggesting that the officer's subjective beliefs are material? hmmm, libs? |