The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
61% decrease in law school applicants with LSAT > 160
Poast new message in this thread
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:02 PM Author: charismatic gay jew property Ouch.
In 2010, 87,900 people applied for the fall term. 35,863 of them had LSAT scores of 160 or higher. (160 is the 80th percentile on the test.). Approximately 53,500 people have or will apply for admission to ABA law schools this fall. About 14,065 of them will have LSAT scores of 160 or higher. This is a 61% decline. Meanwhile, the total number of applicants with LSAT scores below 150 (the 50th percentile) has increased from 12,300 to 18,725. |
 |
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:04 PM Author: Chartreuse Hot Temple link? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736449) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:07 PM Author: charismatic gay jew property http://www.lawyersgunsmoneyblog.com/2017/06/well-qualified-law-school-applicant-pool-declines-61 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736463) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 12:25 AM Author: Diverse bat-shit-crazy abode tbf, if you look at Caron's chart, it looks like a 7% increase in 160+ scorers in 16-17 vs 15-16
http://taxprof.typepad.com/.a/6a00d8341c4eab53ef01b8d2949de4970c-800wi from http://taxprof.typepad.com/taxprof_blog/2017/06/top-college-students-increasingly-are-not-interested-in-law-school.html |
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:03 PM Author: contagious office macaca wow. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736444) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:05 PM Author: Titillating national LSAT takers with 165: getting in everywhere they apply
You: poast |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:21 PM Author: flatulent trust fund philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736528) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:46 PM Author: self-centered regret nibblets (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736631) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:05 PM Author: Mind-boggling theater I applied in 2010. Lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736457) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:08 PM Author: at-the-ready locale toaster (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736469) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:19 PM Author: Chartreuse Hot Temple Is this why law schools are accepting the GRE? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736514) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:21 PM Author: flatulent trust fund philosopher-king (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736527) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:19 PM Author: apoplectic psychic Why can't millennials stop shoving the LSAT up their asses? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736518) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:20 PM Author: Shimmering Dashing Institution Stock Car should be 99% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736524) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:22 PM Author: Balding Plaza Immigrant LJL at hiring any law school graduate who graduated after 2012 or so. Just LMAO. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736539) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 1:11 AM Author: Misunderstood curious house faggotry Hehehe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34737074) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:23 PM Author: flatulent trust fund philosopher-king 165 3.8 is getting NYU and Columbia these days
http://lawschoolnumbers.com/marginallybetter |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:23 PM Author: Frozen Appetizing Milk wow lmao no way (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736545) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 12:15 AM Author: Diverse bat-shit-crazy abode tbf, looks like a nontrad and the only sub-167 admitted on lsn who wasn't a urm
http://columbia.lawschoolnumbers.com/stats/1718 |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:27 PM Author: brass cruise ship sneaky criminal motherfucker. the profession would be so much better off if it made 160 lsats a prerequisite to attending law school. maybe i'm wrong. maybe 155s are capable of practicing law, but i'll leave that for the dumbs to argue |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:31 PM Author: copper mother Coming from anyone else, this poast would be devastating. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736577) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:38 PM Author: chest-beating field I got in with a 170, and now I'm below median, never had any idea wtf is going on in my classes. I predict that I'll get the talk 1.5y in. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736602) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:39 PM Author: flatulent trust fund philosopher-king school range? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736609) |
|
Date: November 20th, 2017 11:47 PM Author: brass cruise ship sneaky criminal it's interesting that a 170 would make a logical fallacy like this. almost as if you didn't get a 170. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736632) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 3:01 AM Author: Glassy odious piazza dragon Nothing about law school is any kind of reliable predictor of your likelihood of getting The Talk. It all comes down to 1) is there a partner who likes you and feeds you work and makes a trusted midlevel/senior associate train you, and 2) can you get things done on time and not make tons of sloppy errors. If you have 1) and 2) you can last until year 5 in relative comfort. If you have 1) but not 2) you will last at least a couple years and many can still make it to inhouse. If you have 2) but not 1) you can last as long as you hustle and your firm and practice area aren't TTT/really slow. In terms of the actual IQ demands of the job it's literally mental effort that a mediocre high school student could manage for the first 18-24 months. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34737393) |
|
Date: November 21st, 2017 12:21 AM Author: Glittery hairy legs a 155 LSAT is still probably smarter than some of the blacks they admit to medical school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3804261&forum_id=2#34736809) |