Lamarcus: how did Greece & Rome have cosmopolitanism without collapsing birthrat
| Hairless magical toilet seat crackhouse | 11/22/17 | | cerise corner round eye | 11/22/17 | | Hairless magical toilet seat crackhouse | 11/22/17 | | cerise corner round eye | 11/22/17 | | cerise corner round eye | 11/22/17 | | misunderstood hell | 11/28/17 | | Hairless magical toilet seat crackhouse | 11/28/17 | | misunderstood hell | 11/28/17 | | tripping passionate meetinghouse community account | 11/28/17 | | misunderstood hell | 11/28/17 | | Hairless magical toilet seat crackhouse | 11/28/17 | | tripping passionate meetinghouse community account | 11/28/17 | | Big Gold Ceo Giraffe | 11/28/17 | | hyperventilating lettuce | 11/28/17 | | misunderstood hell | 11/28/17 | | hyperventilating lettuce | 11/28/17 | | Big Gold Ceo Giraffe | 11/28/17 | | misunderstood hell | 11/28/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: November 22nd, 2017 1:00 AM Author: cerise corner round eye
they just had far less under their belt, far less from society
less control in a relationship
etc.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805488&forum_id=2#34745995) |
Date: November 28th, 2017 1:33 PM Author: misunderstood hell
Rome was built w/ a tradition of Romanizing everyone they conquered - by accepting their elites into their fold.
There were obviously yuge struggles (Social Wars, & part of why Caesar was assassinated was bc he let in all these Gauls into the senate) but for the most part they accepted ppl that WANTED TO BE ROMAN
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805488&forum_id=2#34789853)
|
|
Date: November 28th, 2017 2:04 PM Author: misunderstood hell
Nah. I mean it lasted for hundreds of years - for a polity of that size to be that strong for over 2 centuries, and still be strong enough to hold the mediterranean for 2 more centuries, and then STILL hold on to half of it for hundreds more years, I don't think it had to do anything w/ prolefication.
I blame rise of Islam over anything really
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805488&forum_id=2#34790214) |
Date: November 28th, 2017 2:04 PM Author: tripping passionate meetinghouse community account
Rome actually does seem to have had a relatively low birthrate in the early empire. There's a lot of theories put forward for this, including this lulzy theory that Roman men fucked up their fertility by taking too many hot baths:
http://www.rhm.uni-koeln.de/128/Devine.pdf
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805488&forum_id=2#34790215) |
|
Date: November 28th, 2017 2:05 PM Author: misunderstood hell
Also use of lead vessels to make defrutum, and lead pipes (although lead pipes build up enough lime to really not carry dangerous of amounts of lead given enough time I think)
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3805488&forum_id=2#34790231)
|
|
|