(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34809679)

deranged pumo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34809843)

Defend your stupid fucking statement.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34813718)

"The jury had a number of choices to make. They could have gone with a second degree verdict, involuntary manslaughter or consider a first degree murder verdict."

http://abc7news.com/kate-steinle-murder-suspect-found-not-guilty/2679176/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34809801)

The very liberal jury, consisting of primarily Hispanics, determined that as a minority AND an illegal, the killer had earned so many oppression points that it more than offset what he did to Kate, an evil white oppressor. Therefore, he was not guilty of involuntary manslaughter.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34810593)

fired 3+ shots before hitting Kate

pistol stolen from park ranger

nbd

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34809815)

your daughter or sister gets shot and killed in broad daylight by a homeless illegal felon who had been deported multiple times but was released because of sanctuary city policies, does this and then is cleared in the shooting

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34809819)

fired ONE shot that ricocheted according to news reports/wikipedia. huge difference. if he fired 3 shots he has no defense and goes to prison. where did you read 3 shots?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34810228)

true crime is hate speech by white males.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34809859)

lol, come on. this guy deserves to be killed expeditiously with mexico billed for the price of the rope.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34809863)

Apodaca v. Oregon is still good law. no const requirement for unanimity in a state criminal trial.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34811102)

http://www.nola.com/crime/index.ssf/2017/10/us_supreme_court_wont_hear_lat.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34811115)

Through the miracle of liberalism, we have accepted that our southern border is open to a staggered invasion force, that invaders are entitled to stay here and that, when the invader kills one of us, then we are also obligated to provide the invader with free legal representation.

Now, here's the fucking question libs: Since this invader has been found not guilty, does he get to stay or is he deported? Why? And, if deported and he returns, what then?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34810117)

if he returns, he gets to go back to prison for illegal reentry, which has already happened to him twice. that's the other fucked up thing about this: we get to pay $50k/year to house him. should sign some compact with mexico that they have to keep him imprisoned there for the length of the term.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34810267)

If, on the other hand, we treat foreign invaders as foreign invaders, then if he invades while not wearing a military uniform, then he is an illegal combatant subject to execution by our military. If he invades while wearing a military uniform then, well, he may entitled to POW status but we need to have a little chat with that military about just why their soldiers are invading. Either way, we should not be incurring high prison costs in handling foreign invaders.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3813933&forum_id=2#34810300)