The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Real talk for Trumpmos regarding Moore and Trump
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:12 PM Author: Sick ticket booth brethren 1. Even before the allegations came out, Moore was struggling against Jones. He's a piece of shit human being, period. He has a history of vile racist comments, said openly that he doesn't believe in the constitutional amendments after the 10th, and was expelled from his job as a judge because he defied direct orders from SCOTUS.
2. The allegations, although old, are far more likely to be true than false. We know for a fact that Moore went hunting for young girls at the mall. Moore himself admitted to dating teenage girls when he was in his 30s. So Leigh Corfman's story is not at all bizarre or implausible given Moore's sordid past.
3. Trumpmos need to stop with this "cuck" conspiracy nonsense. Moore did this to himself. There are plenty of Republicans who run for office, who don't have women coming out to accuse them of sexual assault or pedophilia.
4. Bannon is a piece of shit who is doing enormous damage. He chose to support Moore in the GOP primary rather than Brooks, even though the latter is far more likely to support Trump's agenda. Hopefully, this defeat crushes Bannon, so he doesn't run batshit candidates in the GOP primary and throw away our chances in 2018.
5. Now onto Trump. We're in trouble in 2018 and 2020 at this rate. The economy is booming, and Trump is mired in 35-40% approval ratings; that is virtually unheard of in American history. Since midterms are nationalized, it means that Trump will indirectly be on the ballot. Our lead in the House is just 24 seats, and the average midterm loss for a President's first midterm is 28 seats. About a dozen GOP Congressmen are in districts that Hillary won by 5+ points. The Senate looks a bit better, but I'm not convinced that we can pick off all those red states, as Trump's approval isn't that great in those states either.
6. Trumpmos misread the 2016 election result. He won because of a massive drop in Democratic turnout for Hillary vs Obama. Trump got fewer votes in WI than Romney and fewer votes in MI and OH than Bush. In 2020, Hillary will not be on the ballot, and whoever the nominee is, the Democrats will be SUPER PUMPED to defeat Trump.
|
 |
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:36 PM Author: awkward cuckoldry goal in life you also forget that demographics get worse for GOP every fucking year. people seem to think this is some long term thing despite the fact that it's happening right in front of our eyes. Since 2010, rural white areas have DECLINED in population by about 700,000 people (unheard of) while urban Lib areas have INCREASED in population by about 3 million. GOP also fucked for redistricting in 2020. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910007) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:47 PM Author: dun curious school cafeteria hunting ground He would've won thru PA anyway. WI was Hillary's mistake. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910698) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:03 PM Author: poppy ape site I’m a democrat but I think your analysis is spot-on. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910821) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:14 PM Author: cerebral henna theater so is op (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910887) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:16 PM Author: poppy ape site If true, doesn’t make him wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910901) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 5:54 PM Author: racy stag film lettuce Ljl that you thought qualifying that with "im a democratic but" makes your statement some kind of statement against interests. Of course you want what he said to be true. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34911696) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 6:36 PM Author: poppy ape site Well he was offering advice to TrumpMos so I assume he is one or is sympathetic to them. Hence my disclaimer. Of course, it’d be great if the Democrats were successful in next year’s elections. I think they will be for reasons the OP outlined. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34912027) |
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:34 PM Author: Sick ticket booth brethren (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909361) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:35 PM Author: floppy dull genital piercing gaping Risten (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909372) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:37 PM Author: cerebral henna theater Rongtime Tlumpmo herr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909406) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:40 PM Author: trip corn cake center Agreed with a lot of this. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909419) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:34 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle idea he suggested Date: December 13th, 2017 1:40 PM Author: Insane right-wing gun nut
Agreed with a lot of this.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909419) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:35 PM Author: trip corn cake center ?? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909988) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:48 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle idea he suggested you're on the record literally agreeing with buck-toothed chimp JJC (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910157) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:43 PM Author: Blathering lascivious resort round eye You shouldn't agree with 3 or 4.
For 3, there's no "conspiracy nonsense." A former Jeb! staffer rounded up the women and took them to the media.
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3822200&mc=15&forum_id=2
If that doesn't evidence the ultimate cuck betrayal - working to hand over a seat to the libs rather than a nationalist, after the NeverTrump movement to hand the election to Hillary - I don't know what will.
And for 4, no doubt Brooks was better. But Bannon couldn't have endorsed him since Mitch McConnell took him out. To the extent Bannon could have chose Brooks but did not, I agree that's tremendously stupid.
The big picture game played by the cucks is go along with our amnesty candidates or else we will actively work to sink you and hand power to the libs. Nothing "conspiracy" about it. I'm never voting for a cuck again. |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:41 PM Author: Nighttime theatre bbw Oh no lawman! Tell us you’ll change your mind and vote for a “cuck” again lolololol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910669) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:41 PM Author: pearl beady-eyed sanctuary boltzmann Cop (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909428) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:47 PM Author: Bronze Digit Ratio op is confirmed jjc alt (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909476) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:50 PM Author: Cordovan spectacular hairy legs (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909514) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:50 PM Author: cerebral henna theater (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909515) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:34 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle idea he suggested (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909981) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:47 PM Author: Tan excitant senate You're a piece of shit if you don't like every single constitutional amendment? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909484) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:36 PM Author: Geriatric Mint Whorehouse Elastic Band He said he'd be fine with cutting out everything past the 10th, lol. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910000) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:02 PM Author: poppy ape site Including the 17th! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910812) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:34 PM Author: opaque really tough guy tbf they get increasingly less prestigious after the 10th (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34911044) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:48 PM Author: Balding peach psychic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909491) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 1:49 PM Author: Diverse frum principal's office Risten! (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909504) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:43 PM Author: Sick ticket booth brethren You sound MAF that your pedophile candidate lost (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910085) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:31 PM Author: doobsian school 100% cr. he's still better than any shitlib tho (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909946) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:33 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle idea he suggested ROOK, (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909962) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:34 PM Author: Mahogany comical base degenerate DAS A VIRE LACIST (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34909970) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:44 PM Author: scarlet galvanic toaster state (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910684) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 2:36 PM Author: crystalline bonkers friendly grandma 6. Trumpmos misread the 2016 election result. He won because of a massive drop in Democratic turnout for Hillary vs Obama. Trump got fewer votes in WI than Romney and fewer votes in MI and OH than Bush. In 2020, Hillary will not be on the ballot, and whoever the nominee is, the Democrats will be SUPER PUMPED to defeat Trump
yeah no one ever talks about this |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:51 PM Author: Tan excitant senate I don't know, they sure seemed pretty pumped to me (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910726) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:14 PM Author: avocado sneaky criminal spot lol, what is this "we" and "our" talk? the congressional GOP isn't "our" team. it is mostly cucks and cowardly faggots who are letting paul ryan and his shitty agenda boss them around. trump's problem is that he hasn't stood up to ryan, but has instead been trying to implement ryan's shitty, unpopular agenda. populism wins elections; ryanism is electoral death.
i hope the congressional GOP gets absolutely reamed in 2018. at least with a democrat house, trump can bypass the ryan cabal and MAYBE get some populist shit done. |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:20 PM Author: Blathering lascivious resort round eye I'm more on your side than JJC's side.
Cucks are never getting my vote again. |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:36 PM Author: Razzle-dazzle idea he suggested (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910622) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:38 PM Author: cerebral henna theater more like Trump needs to listen to Coulter's advice. she's never been wrong in the last few years (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910634) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:41 PM Author: Blathering lascivious resort round eye Did you read her column? She also says not to vote for cucks. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910667) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:09 PM Author: avocado sneaky criminal spot the cucks want to have it both ways - they want to get the big money by selling out to neoliberal/corporate interests while benefiting from populist (mainly white) voters because of their republican affiliation. and it has worked well for these feckless faggots so far. but it's time to pull their cords. if you don't deliver for the people you purport to represent, then there is no reason to offer you any support. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910853) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:13 PM Author: Blathering lascivious resort round eye Exactly. This isn't rocket science. Not sure why some have a hard time figuring it out. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910884) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:24 PM Author: Geriatric Mint Whorehouse Elastic Band It is hard because the "non-cuck" "anti-establishment" element that supported Trump doesn't have clear policy preferences on things like the budget, taxes, healthcare, financial regulation etc. Trump and them are all over the place on this stuff. Add in the other factions in the GOP and you're trying to hit a moving target to get anything passed. So anytime the party tries to tackle something complex, it drafts garbage legislation that no one likes. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910972) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:48 PM Author: Blathering lascivious resort round eye I think this is a red herring.
The nationalist platform espoused by Candidate Trump (originated by Bannon and Miller) has coherent policy preferences on many issues.
Trade: An end to free trade agreements that hurt US workers.
Immigration: Strict border control, deportation of illegals, many policy measures to reverse the flood of legal third world immigration.
Strongly against political correctness.
Media, education, and civil service reform.
Strong promotion of traditional Western values.
Above all: policies that put American workers first.
While it's true that nationalists don't have clear policy preferences on things like the budget or healthcare, that is no impediment for non-cucks to realize how badly the cucks are screwing them, and to eschew them in favor of candidates who espouse the ideas I said above.
|
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:22 PM Author: bistre indian lodge foreskin Most of this is true.
2018: Regarding the Senate "we" dont need to pick off all of those redstates...only a few. They are currently Dem seats. So just win a few and it negates a Dem pickup here or there like AZ or AL (lol).
Regarding the House, 2010 Republicans did a great gerrymandering job. Itll be a 5-10 seat unworkable majority either way. Probably to the Dems.
2020: No one fucking knows, this doesn't even begin until next December. |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:59 PM Author: Spruce Meetinghouse Travel Guidebook Best case scenario is that the Dems take the house and spend their entire off-year "investigating" DJT on RUSSIA!!! instead of actually forcing votes on their more politically popular wedge issues. The public will be unimpressed, the fire lit under the Dem base will go out, and the GOP wins the house/senate back in 2020. The 2018 Senate will be a net-zero trade where GOP picks up MT/ND, and Dems pick up AZ/NV.
Worst case scenario is that the Dems win control of some state houses going into 2018/2020 and redistrict the fuck out of the GOP after the 2020 census. Demographics have not been kind to whitey over the last 10 years, and the 2021 redistricting could be disastrous. |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:01 PM Author: bistre indian lodge foreskin (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910803) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:50 PM Author: canary pisswyrm mediation Yeah we are going to lose seats big in 2018 imo. If the economy is still strong in 2020 (huge if), I think we will be alright. Everyone is getting MAF that republicans control everything and are doing nothing. If dems win the house at least trump can get MAF at them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910718) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:52 PM Author: Sick ticket booth brethren 2018 will be a bloodbath. XO 90 IQ Trumptards will kill themselves when Dems take back Congress. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3827584&forum_id=2#34910730) |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 3:55 PM Author: dun curious school cafeteria hunting ground Were Obamatards 90 IQ for supporting a candidate who was polarizing to white working class voters in middle america and who generated massive controversy from those who opposed him and didn't want to work with him?
Was the Tea Party retarded for trying to cynically exploit those sentiments which lead to Trump?
If you wanted to be intellectually consistent about this, you should've just backed Jeb/Charlie Crist-style republicans (Mccain/Kasich probably fit better than Jeb here). |
|
Date: December 13th, 2017 4:01 PM Author: dun curious school cafeteria hunting ground Or how about Bush supporters in 2000?, it was Bush who led to Obama.
You can play this game many ways. A significant chunk of even the Tea Party set of politicians wouldn't have careers without Bush. |