speaking of, time to go lol @ tears on imgur

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34918117)

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=LFhT6H6pRWg

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34918133)

lmao 1k thumbs up, 45k thumbs down

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34918179)

ISPs will simply refuse to deliver traffic to pirating websites.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34918182)

Common sense should tell you that they'll give torrent/pirating sites either the lowest priority, or no priority at all. I can explain this "common sense" if you don't understand it.

But I'll wait for your explanation first.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34918416)

The FCC is making the argument that these rules are redundant because reinstating Title I gives authority to the FTC to enforce ISP commitments not to throttle and has heightened disclosure requirements which they think is enough to turn market forces against the ISPs. They seem to neglect the problem that consolidation of ISPs doesn't leave consumers with much alternatives, at least currently.

In short, torrenting is probably fucked.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34918694)

And yes, it will also hurt pirates.

It's going through so the ISPs can make more money.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34919623)

That just hides your input (where you are accessing your connection).

It has nothing to do with your output (the sites you visit).

The ISPs will kill bandwidth to pirate sites, the output. So it doesn't matter what location you use to access the sites. They won't load no matter where you say you're from.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34919881)

Author: lawman8

How does a VPN get around that?

That just hides your input (where you are accessing your connection).

It has nothing to do with your output (the sites you visit).

The ISPs will kill bandwidth to pirate sites, the output. So it doesn't matter what location you use to access the sites. They won't load no matter where you say you're from.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34919881)

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34919959)

If you're connected to a VPN, torrents can't get throttled by your own ISP without throttling the entire VPN connection.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34920805)

Any VPN companies that are publicly tradeable? I have a feeling their stock prices will go up.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34923702)

we'll see what matters because of this deal, if they want exposure media will remain much the same, basically free.

if they want money they'll start charging for things and will get many less eyeballs as they used to.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34918454)

other than hits like Stranger Things most of these self made shows that netflix, amazon, hulu make are complete garbage

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34919555)

Ajit is just a corporate stooge. Anyone could fill the position.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34919639)

The biggest drawback from a non-neutral internet is that it will all but rule out the possibility of new startups with business plans involving use of large amounts of bandwidth to deliver time-sensitive data, such as video and real-time audio or visual communications. Out of necessity, any such startup MUST be acquired by one of the established big players to leverage their established QoS agreements in order to roll out their product. In other words, the YouTubes and Facetimes of the world will become even more entrenched than they currently are.

The demise of Net Neutrality will also allow ISPs to capture more of the consumer surplus arising from current online products via de facto tolls based upon consumer demand for individual web services.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34919771)

http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2017/12/13/tim_wu_explains_why_the_tech_companies_that_love_net_neutrality_have_a_ton.html

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34925463)

Remember, this policy change was pushed through by the same people who figured out how to get the average consumer to spend like 30% of their discretionary spending on their product (cable package with multiple boxes).

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34920236)

you realize that "net neutrality" is just anotehr word for government regulation and red tape, right?

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34922143)

For the truth, look at this subthread:

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&mc=90&forum_id=2#34920483

The ISPs WILL fuck us with this. There is literally zero benefit to the consumer.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34923722)

"In early 2005, in the Madison River case, the FCC for the first time showed willingness to enforce its network neutrality principles by opening an investigation about Madison River Communications, a local telephone carrier that was blocking voice over IP service. Yet the FCC did not fine Madison River Communications. The investigation was closed before any formal factual or legal finding and there was a settlement in which the company agreed to stop discriminating against voice over IP traffic and to make a $15,000 payment to the US Treasury in exchange for the FCC dropping its inquiry.[28] Since the FCC did not formally establish that Madison River Communications violated laws and regulation, the Madison River settlement does not create a formal precedent. Nevertheless, the FCC's action established that it would take enforcement action in such situations."

"In August 2008, the FCC made its first Internet network management decision.[42] It voted 3-to-2 to uphold a complaint against Comcast ruling that it had illegally inhibited users of its high-speed Internet service from using file-sharing software because it throttled the bandwidth available to certain customers for video files to ensure that other customers had adequate bandwidth.[43][44] The FCC imposed no fine, but required Comcast to end such blocking in the year 2008, ordered Comcast to disclose the details of its network management practices within 30 days, submit a compliance plan for ending the offending practices by the end of the year, and disclose to the public the details of intended future practices. Then-FCC chairman Kevin J. Martin said the order was meant to set a precedent, that Internet providers and all communications companies could not prevent customers from using their networks the way they see fit, unless there is a good reason. In an interview Martin stated that "We are preserving the open character of the Internet" and "We are saying that network operators can't block people from getting access to any content and any applications." The case highlighted whether new legislation is needed to force Internet providers to maintain network neutrality, i.e., treat all uses of their networks equally. The legal complaint against Comcast was related to BitTorrent, software that is commonly used for downloading movies, television shows, music and software on the Internet.[45]"

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Net_neutrality_in_the_United_States

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34920830)

this horrible outcome that needs to be prevented (oh no, netflix had to pay off an ISP! poor netflix!) is actually the marketplace working the way it should. we dont need some faggot needledicked govt regulator to rubber stamp all this bullshit. and fuck you for thinking we do you dumb kike.

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34922164)

Once you are in that world you can't just sit back and say "FREE MARKET".

(https://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3828854&forum_id=2#34926078)