XO math people please critique my analysis of MPM 2016 voting irregularity
| narrow-minded headpube | 12/20/17 | | Concupiscible Casino | 12/20/17 | | elite 180 base pozpig | 12/20/17 | | Concupiscible Casino | 12/20/17 | | gaped psychic plaza | 12/20/17 | | Exhilarant menage | 12/20/17 | | narrow-minded headpube | 12/20/17 | | Alcoholic fishy pit personal credit line | 02/22/18 | | transparent motley turdskin hairy legs | 12/20/17 | | narrow-minded headpube | 12/20/17 | | Orchid Windowlicker | 12/20/17 | | narrow-minded headpube | 12/20/17 | | Maroon garrison | 12/21/17 | | narrow-minded headpube | 12/20/17 | | narrow-minded headpube | 12/20/17 | | carmine naked temple useless brakes | 12/20/17 | | Maroon garrison | 12/20/17 | | transparent motley turdskin hairy legs | 12/20/17 | | Maroon garrison | 12/20/17 | | Maroon garrison | 12/20/17 | | Maroon garrison | 12/23/17 | | Maroon garrison | 12/20/17 | | razzmatazz goal in life | 12/23/17 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: December 20th, 2017 5:34 PM Author: Maroon garrison
solid analysis, correct math, correct conclusions and implications
the precise results of the analysis depend on your view that the data are normally distrbuted. eyeballing the histogram makes me comfortable that they probably are, but there are a bunch of tests you could do to confirm on a statistical level; you could also explore the possibility that there is a bimodal distribution although the histogram doesn’t look that way
but I’m sure this would be a hilarious outlier under any reasonable distribution
in summary: absolutely devastating
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3835527&forum_id=2#34969211) |
|
|