For years people complained about the working conditions in biglaw
| bipolar fiercely-loyal yarmulke | 01/17/18 | | aquamarine heady selfie headpube | 01/17/18 | | carnelian stag film | 01/17/18 | | Saffron self-absorbed station national security agency | 01/17/18 | | bipolar fiercely-loyal yarmulke | 01/17/18 | | Obsidian Hairraiser Ladyboy | 01/17/18 | | Contagious point | 01/17/18 | | Geriatric twinkling uncleanness location | 01/17/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 17th, 2018 8:24 PM Author: bipolar fiercely-loyal yarmulke
And then gradually people started admitting that you rarely work a full day, that the pay is great, etc. And people who switched out of biglaw didn't land in a more chill situation, missed the pay, etc.
Am I reading this right? Was all that complaining justified? Or were the complainers just bitchass millennials who didn't want to lift a finger?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863183&forum_id=2#35179478) |
Date: January 17th, 2018 8:38 PM Author: Contagious point
My understanding is that biglaw post-2008 is different from biglaw pre-2008- we never got as busy as people were in 2007
The bad part of the job is the limited control - if you have a busy a month is largely out of your hands - whether you're working this weekend is largely out of your hands - etc.
But, I can't imagine it is that much better in house making 1/3rds as much
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3863183&forum_id=2#35179564) |
|
|