non retards: help me understand governance issues for Dapps
| excitant temple | 01/21/18 | | multi-colored green legend resort | 01/21/18 | | excitant temple | 01/21/18 | | multi-colored green legend resort | 01/21/18 | | excitant temple | 01/21/18 | | multi-colored green legend resort | 01/21/18 | | excitant temple | 01/21/18 | | excitant temple | 01/21/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: January 21st, 2018 2:21 PM Author: excitant temple
i知 rapidly evolving from a brainless crypto speculator to a brainless crypto speculator with an actual interest in the implications of blockchain and smart contract platforms. the potential for Dapps to disrupt economic models where intermediaries capture economic rents that might otherwise accrue to providers and users (eg airbnb, uber) is obvious. combine this with the disintermediation of payments, insurance, incorporation of internet of things etc and the possibilities are fucking mindblowing.
i still think a totally decentralized economic model for something like blockchain-Uber sounds impractical. i知 not some retarded neckbeard reflexively skeptical of smart people making strategic decisions on behalf of an economic enterprise. in other words some centralization seems necessary - it壇 be retarded to try and make every decision via consensus of all token holders. have people thought about this at all? what are some solutions people have proposed? off the top of my head i can think of mechanisms for delegating votes to trusted token holders or decentralized applications that identify trusted decision makers for otherwise decentralized applications. can you point me to reading material on this issue specifically?
thanks. sorry to interrupt regularly scheduled n threading with my geeky stream of consciousness
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3866375&forum_id=2#35203258) |
|
|