The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Iornically if the framers had adopted Vermont's verbiage on gun rights
| Judgmental bossy brunch | 02/18/18 |
| ebony thriller parlor partner | 02/18/18 |
| Judgmental bossy brunch | 02/18/18 |
| Swollen impressive chad crackhouse | 02/18/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 18th, 2018 11:45 AM Author: Judgmental bossy brunch The gun control debate would be nonexistent. The liberal state in the country has the most unambiguous gun rights language in its constitution:
Article 16. [Right to bear arms; standing armies; military power subordinate to civil]
That the people have a right to bear arms for the defence of themselves and the State--and as standing armies in time of peace are dangerous to liberty, they ought not to be kept up; and that the military should be kept under strict subordination to and governed by the civil power. |
 |
Date: February 18th, 2018 11:49 AM Author: ebony thriller parlor partner Live free or die. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3896664&forum_id=2#35430491) |
|
Date: February 18th, 2018 11:50 AM Author: Judgmental bossy brunch It makes you wonder why the founding fathers used such convoluted language in the 2A. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3896664&forum_id=2#35430496) |
Date: February 18th, 2018 11:52 AM Author: Swollen impressive chad crackhouse Yeah but we'd have been conquered in the early 19th century without a standing army. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3896664&forum_id=2#35430502) |