Serious Question: Why do people take Julia seriously?
| Jet-lagged azn | 02/20/18 | | self-absorbed violent menage cuckold | 02/20/18 | | Razzmatazz church | 02/20/18 | | lemon buck-toothed quadroon juggernaut | 02/20/18 | | claret deer antler | 02/20/18 | | beady-eyed twinkling uncleanness | 02/20/18 | | Milky spectacular genital piercing | 02/20/18 | | Jet-lagged azn | 02/20/18 | | self-centered cyan indirect expression | 02/20/18 | | lemon buck-toothed quadroon juggernaut | 02/20/18 | | Jet-lagged azn | 02/20/18 | | Hot cumskin digit ratio | 02/20/18 | | shivering rigpig theater stage | 02/20/18 | | claret deer antler | 02/20/18 | | violent galvanic toaster | 02/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 20th, 2018 4:29 PM Author: Jet-lagged azn
we know her life story, we saw her "analysis/insight" during 2016 election cycle, we see her consistently use management speak gibberish that doesn't really explain/support her predictions
Its one thing to be wrong (nobody can be right 100%, even being 50/50 on predictions is good batting average ) but what really stands out about Julia is her total inability to offer any kind of serious, logical analysis to back up her arguments. that is egregious
For ex. when somebody asked her why she feels Dow is due for a major correction in the near~medium time frame this is her answer. Now even if Dow has a major correction we shouldn't let her claim any credit for this bullshit analysis
"The answer is a combination of factors, in proportions we don’t yet understand, but one of which will surely be simple negative sentiment, as demonstrated by the big drops two weeks ago or practically any big decline in history. Fundamentals impact sentiment, but the two aren’t perfectly correlated, and market euphoria and panics are difgicult to predict or control."
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3898680&forum_id=2#35446674) |
|
|