\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

True PATRIOT and SCHOLAR xo jared taylor suing tttwitttttter

https://youtu.be/CUg5TrWzjzY
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/21/18
Full complaint: https://www.scribd.com/document/372035678/Ta...
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/21/18
...
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/21/18
Randazza is bringing some pretty novel claims here. The only...
Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station
  02/21/18
All the claims look viable to me. Whether a shitlib Californ...
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/21/18
Did you even read it? The California constitutional claims u...
Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station
  02/21/18
Yes, and the complaint sets out the grounds for the relief r...
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/21/18
This legal tactic has been bandied about in conservative leg...
Pink Liquid Oxygen
  02/21/18
...
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/21/18
Just because idiots bandy something about doesn't mean it is...
Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station
  02/22/18
Cal SC had its chance to overturn Pruneyard and - stupidly -...
scarlet territorial legal warrant
  02/22/18
They affirmed it but also narrowed its scope significantly. ...
Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station
  02/22/18
Actual lawyer here, yes the Cal SC could always create some ...
scarlet territorial legal warrant
  02/22/18
Maybe, except the Cal. Sup. Ct. came back in Ralphs Grocery ...
Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station
  02/22/18
going to be upfront here buddy - I'm actually *on* the Calif...
scarlet territorial legal warrant
  02/22/18
LOL. Alright then.
Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station
  02/22/18
...
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/22/18
tuhhhwhhitter
Outnumbered crackhouse gaping
  02/21/18
...
boyish dopamine lodge
  02/21/18
...
aromatic associate
  02/21/18
Are there no scholars on xo to analyze what could be a landm...
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/21/18
do you think we're lawyers or something?
aromatic associate
  02/21/18
???
henna vivacious cruise ship
  02/22/18
no
beady-eyed effete feces
  02/22/18
...
beady-eyed effete feces
  02/22/18
is there a legal basis for the argument that a private compa...
vibrant geriatric parlor
  02/22/18
Yes
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/22/18
Not really. The argument they're making is based on the ...
Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station
  02/22/18
so you're saying they're making an argument and there is a l...
boyish dopamine lodge
  02/22/18
I'm saying the argument they're making isn't based on associ...
Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station
  02/22/18
There are also contractual and other statutory arguments bes...
floppy sooty nowag space
  02/22/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 10:53 AM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space

https://youtu.be/CUg5TrWzjzY

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451667)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:03 AM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space

Full complaint: https://www.scribd.com/document/372035678/Taylor-v-Twitter-Complaint

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451721)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:25 AM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451867)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:38 AM
Author: Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station

Randazza is bringing some pretty novel claims here. The only one that looks remotely viable to me is the breach of contract claim against Twitter over the terms of service.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451970)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 12:50 PM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space

All the claims look viable to me. Whether a shitlib California judge will agree is another story

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35452513)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 3:35 PM
Author: Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station

Did you even read it? The California constitutional claims under Robins v. Pruneyard are interesting, but a YUGE stretch. Same with the Unruh claims.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35453990)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 3:43 PM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space

Yes, and the complaint sets out the grounds for the relief requested quite clearly. I'm sure there's competing case law on the other side and perhaps it's overwhelming against Taylor but I wouldn't describe the claims as a stretch on paper.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35454064)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:03 PM
Author: Pink Liquid Oxygen

This legal tactic has been bandied about in conservative legal circles for some time

http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/twitters-censorship-may-be-unconstitutional/article/2617261

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457710)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:18 PM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457845)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:42 AM
Author: Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station

Just because idiots bandy something about doesn't mean it is valid.

The California Supreme Court has spent 30 years limiting its Pruneyard decision to the point where it literally only applies to facts that are on all fours. Turning Twitter into that kind of public square - even with the U.S. Supreme Court's dicta in Packingham - is going to be a tremendous uphill battle. Not saying it's impossible, just novel and unlikely.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459421)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:29 AM
Author: scarlet territorial legal warrant

Cal SC had its chance to overturn Pruneyard and - stupidly - affirmed it 4-3.

I don't see how there's any way Twitter avoids a pruneyard claim unless they finally overturn it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459348)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:43 AM
Author: Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station

They affirmed it but also narrowed its scope significantly. See above.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459424)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:21 AM
Author: scarlet territorial legal warrant

Actual lawyer here, yes the Cal SC could always create some results-oriented jurisprudence and decide that Pruneyard doesn't apply to twitter because, mumble mumble mumble, but any honest application of the precedent would hold that Pruneyard either applies to Twitter or should be overturned.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459575)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:54 AM
Author: Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station

Maybe, except the Cal. Sup. Ct. came back in Ralphs Grocery Co. v. United Food and Commercial Workers Union (2012) and signficantly limited Pruneyard's application to public gathering areas at shopping centers. The principles may be similar, but there are major differences, beginning with the user agreement that one has to enter into in order to use Twitter's services.

Again, they might get there, but it's going to be a big stretch.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459750)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 10:21 AM
Author: scarlet territorial legal warrant

going to be upfront here buddy - I'm actually *on* the California Supreme Court and I'm planning on holding that Pruneyard applies. HTMFH

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459881)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 10:21 AM
Author: Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station

LOL. Alright then.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459884)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 10:15 AM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459851)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:06 AM
Author: Outnumbered crackhouse gaping

tuhhhwhhitter

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35451737)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 3:39 PM
Author: boyish dopamine lodge



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35454017)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:13 PM
Author: aromatic associate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457801)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 10:56 PM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space

Are there no scholars on xo to analyze what could be a landmark case?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457638)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 21st, 2018 11:13 PM
Author: aromatic associate

do you think we're lawyers or something?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35457804)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:27 AM
Author: henna vivacious cruise ship

???

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459337)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:46 AM
Author: beady-eyed effete feces

no

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459433)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 8:49 AM
Author: beady-eyed effete feces



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35459444)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 10:55 AM
Author: vibrant geriatric parlor

is there a legal basis for the argument that a private company should be required to associate with white nationalists even if it doesnt want to?



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460148)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 11:05 AM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space

Yes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460220)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 11:07 AM
Author: Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station

Not really.

The argument they're making is based on the Pruneyard decision of the Cal. Sup. Ct. that allows private property to be treated as a public forum in limited circumstances, thereby limiting the property owner's ability to limit speech in that place.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460245)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 11:08 AM
Author: boyish dopamine lodge

so you're saying they're making an argument and there is a legal basis for that argument

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460249)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 11:10 AM
Author: Appetizing indecent international law enforcement agency station

I'm saying the argument they're making isn't based on association, which is what the OP of this subthread asked about.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460270)



Reply Favorite

Date: February 22nd, 2018 12:22 PM
Author: floppy sooty nowag space

There are also contractual and other statutory arguments besides the California constitution made which all have prima facie bases. Obviously there isn't a direct precedent and that's why it could be a landmark case but the foundation to build it is there

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3899355&forum_id=2#35460853)