Hilarious how "scientific enlightenment" atheists got pwned by SJWs
| orchid odious foreskin | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | orchid odious foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Hairraiser Useless Brakes Milk | 02/22/18 | | Lime fragrant pit brethren | 02/22/18 | | orchid odious foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Mustard piazza | 02/22/18 | | Lime fragrant pit brethren | 02/22/18 | | Charismatic headpube | 02/22/18 | | Curious Church | 02/22/18 | | orchid odious foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Sexy anal heaven | 02/22/18 | | Lime fragrant pit brethren | 02/22/18 | | Arousing trump supporter indian lodge | 02/22/18 | | Violet Indirect Expression Theatre | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | Canary state | 02/22/18 | | Hairraiser Useless Brakes Milk | 02/22/18 | | Twinkling main people stain | 02/22/18 | | Brindle trust fund shitlib | 03/01/18 | | Sexy anal heaven | 02/22/18 | | orchid odious foreskin | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | Cerebral deranged orchestra pit | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | fluffy shimmering lodge boiling water | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | Hairraiser Useless Brakes Milk | 02/22/18 | | Iridescent Provocative Library | 02/22/18 | | Sexy anal heaven | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | Sexy anal heaven | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | Sexy anal heaven | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | Iridescent Provocative Library | 02/22/18 | | Iridescent Provocative Library | 02/22/18 | | Lime fragrant pit brethren | 02/22/18 | | Iridescent Provocative Library | 02/22/18 | | Lime fragrant pit brethren | 02/22/18 | | Iridescent Provocative Library | 02/22/18 | | Razzle bipolar brunch karate | 02/24/18 | | Titillating cerise people who are hurt public bath | 02/24/18 | | Lime fragrant pit brethren | 02/24/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | Sexy anal heaven | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | comical splenetic dilemma | 02/22/18 | | Violet Indirect Expression Theatre | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | sienna spot coldplay fan | 02/22/18 | | Hairraiser Useless Brakes Milk | 02/22/18 | | orchid odious foreskin | 02/27/18 | | swashbuckling slate stage | 02/22/18 | | Arousing trump supporter indian lodge | 02/22/18 | | fluffy shimmering lodge boiling water | 02/22/18 | | orchid odious foreskin | 02/24/18 | | Titillating cerise people who are hurt public bath | 02/24/18 | | orchid odious foreskin | 02/24/18 | | Titillating cerise people who are hurt public bath | 02/24/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: February 22nd, 2018 5:04 PM Author: sienna spot coldplay fan
Interesting.
Can you be a Catholic and deny, say, Virgin birth or Jesus' resurrection?
Can you be a Christian and deny the resurrection?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900758&forum_id=2#35463353) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2018 5:15 PM Author: sienna spot coldplay fan
I think there is some room for equivocation also.
But --the difficulty that I have--is there are at least a handful of definitional beliefs you have to have to be a Christian--not least of which is that there is a God --not a sim maker or anything like that--but an actual god who seems to correlate in some respect with the described god of the new testament.
It seems to me that this has to be demonstrated as Probable before any other musings or analysis or critical thought even matters on the subject. And I just don't see how this has been done. There's some circular self-referential posturing and assertions about the need for "faith" in lieu of evidence, but that's ... a whole other gloss.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900758&forum_id=2#35463460) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:30 PM Author: swashbuckling slate stage
you're probably thinking of things and thinking of "reality" in very limited, very narrow epistemic terms. a lot of the more complex philosophy of religion deals with a different set of epistemic premises. to draw an analogy, let's say that "reality" has aspects of a simulation or a psuedo-simulation. in that case, what "is" is a programmable function, and there are systems in which the behavior of a "character" actually helps program the simulation (genetic algorithms, etc.).
so in that sense, a religious "belief" can be seen not as an attempt to stake a claim to a "truth" in a fixed epistemic universe (which is probably the level at which your epistemic thinking is focused), but rather, an attempt to bring the self into alignment with a NEW reality; an emergent reality which is produced IN CONCORDANCE with the belief.
these are massive oversimplifications, but you can see how this sort of thinking is a lot more complex than most critics of religion would realize.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900758&forum_id=2#35465536) |
|
|