Hilarious how "scientific enlightenment" atheists got pwned by SJWs
| Chestnut soul-stirring liquid oxygen mental disorder | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Chestnut soul-stirring liquid oxygen mental disorder | 02/22/18 | | Wonderful Elastic Band | 02/22/18 | | mind-boggling blue trump supporter whorehouse | 02/22/18 | | Chestnut soul-stirring liquid oxygen mental disorder | 02/22/18 | | misunderstood mother mad cow disease | 02/22/18 | | mind-boggling blue trump supporter whorehouse | 02/22/18 | | puce boiling water | 02/22/18 | | Twinkling stage | 02/22/18 | | Chestnut soul-stirring liquid oxygen mental disorder | 02/22/18 | | sinister shrine | 02/22/18 | | mind-boggling blue trump supporter whorehouse | 02/22/18 | | Territorial orange point shitlib | 02/22/18 | | Boyish bright parlor ladyboy | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Stimulating Mediation | 02/22/18 | | Wonderful Elastic Band | 02/22/18 | | cowardly coffee pot | 02/22/18 | | orchid yarmulke | 03/01/18 | | sinister shrine | 02/22/18 | | Chestnut soul-stirring liquid oxygen mental disorder | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Drab property | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Dashing Avocado Sanctuary | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Wonderful Elastic Band | 02/22/18 | | spectacular skinny woman | 02/22/18 | | sinister shrine | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | sinister shrine | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | sinister shrine | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | spectacular skinny woman | 02/22/18 | | spectacular skinny woman | 02/22/18 | | mind-boggling blue trump supporter whorehouse | 02/22/18 | | spectacular skinny woman | 02/22/18 | | mind-boggling blue trump supporter whorehouse | 02/22/18 | | spectacular skinny woman | 02/22/18 | | Disturbing contagious candlestick maker dysfunction | 02/24/18 | | copper 180 goal in life | 02/24/18 | | mind-boggling blue trump supporter whorehouse | 02/24/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | sinister shrine | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Violet bat shit crazy windowlicker | 02/22/18 | | Boyish bright parlor ladyboy | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | pea-brained foreskin | 02/22/18 | | Wonderful Elastic Band | 02/22/18 | | Chestnut soul-stirring liquid oxygen mental disorder | 02/27/18 | | Carnelian Hospital Love Of Her Life | 02/22/18 | | Territorial orange point shitlib | 02/22/18 | | Dashing Avocado Sanctuary | 02/22/18 | | Chestnut soul-stirring liquid oxygen mental disorder | 02/24/18 | | copper 180 goal in life | 02/24/18 | | Chestnut soul-stirring liquid oxygen mental disorder | 02/24/18 | | copper 180 goal in life | 02/24/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
|
Date: February 22nd, 2018 5:04 PM Author: pea-brained foreskin
Interesting.
Can you be a Catholic and deny, say, Virgin birth or Jesus' resurrection?
Can you be a Christian and deny the resurrection?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900758&forum_id=2#35463353) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2018 5:15 PM Author: pea-brained foreskin
I think there is some room for equivocation also.
But --the difficulty that I have--is there are at least a handful of definitional beliefs you have to have to be a Christian--not least of which is that there is a God --not a sim maker or anything like that--but an actual god who seems to correlate in some respect with the described god of the new testament.
It seems to me that this has to be demonstrated as Probable before any other musings or analysis or critical thought even matters on the subject. And I just don't see how this has been done. There's some circular self-referential posturing and assertions about the need for "faith" in lieu of evidence, but that's ... a whole other gloss.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900758&forum_id=2#35463460) |
|
Date: February 22nd, 2018 9:30 PM Author: Carnelian Hospital Love Of Her Life
you're probably thinking of things and thinking of "reality" in very limited, very narrow epistemic terms. a lot of the more complex philosophy of religion deals with a different set of epistemic premises. to draw an analogy, let's say that "reality" has aspects of a simulation or a psuedo-simulation. in that case, what "is" is a programmable function, and there are systems in which the behavior of a "character" actually helps program the simulation (genetic algorithms, etc.).
so in that sense, a religious "belief" can be seen not as an attempt to stake a claim to a "truth" in a fixed epistemic universe (which is probably the level at which your epistemic thinking is focused), but rather, an attempt to bring the self into alignment with a NEW reality; an emergent reality which is produced IN CONCORDANCE with the belief.
these are massive oversimplifications, but you can see how this sort of thinking is a lot more complex than most critics of religion would realize.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3900758&forum_id=2#35465536) |
|
|