The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Why hasn't THE LAW transitioned from .pdf to .oxps?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: February 23rd, 2018 1:59 PM Author: Swashbuckling sanctuary sneaky criminal PDF sucks dick. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470467) |
Date: February 23rd, 2018 1:59 PM Author: lime submissive cuckoldry wasn't THE LAW still using WordPerfect until early this decade? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470470) |
 |
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:04 PM Author: Razzmatazz mustard orchestra pit pozpig Lol, I used word perfect and loislaw as a summer in the late aughts. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470523) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2018 10:10 AM Author: Vermilion Frisky Center Factory Reset Button My firms dms shows we switched in 2007. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35526206) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 1:59 PM Author: Indigo internal respiration I heard partners at SullCrom still use Windows 95 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470475) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:03 PM Author: Ungodly masturbator not flame, debevoise was still on xp when microsoft cut off support a few years ago. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470499) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:04 PM Author: Indigo internal respiration lmfao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470515) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:01 PM Author: Big Regret 90%+ of lawyers are like 90. Very high median age. It's an old man's profession. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470489) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:03 PM Author: Indigo internal respiration Diaper dispensers in every office by 2020 (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470511) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:03 PM Author: Flickering Mexican Yarmulke What are the advantanges? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470504) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:05 PM Author: flirting 180 hissy fit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470530) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:06 PM Author: Ungodly masturbator i dunno, but it's bullshit that you need "Acrobat Pro" to do simple shit like apply redactions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470544) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:20 PM Author: charismatic jet-lagged lodge foreskin (guy trusting electronic redactions) (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470692) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:21 PM Author: Ungodly masturbator thats how we file shit under seal. maybe we print and scan before filing--not positive. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470701) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:24 PM Author: charismatic jet-lagged lodge foreskin If you don't, you should definitely print and scan. I usually love technology, but on more than one occasion I've received documents from the other side that were "redacted" but still contained extracted text for the full doc. In one case it was every single redacted doc in their production. Obviously in that case it's a problem with Relativity settings or whatever they were using, but I've seen it in individual PDFs too. Curmudgeonly as it sounds, it's better to be safe than sorry. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470717) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:27 PM Author: Swashbuckling sanctuary sneaky criminal Lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470753) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:37 PM Author: diverse cocky bawdyhouse boltzmann "on more than one occasion I've received documents from the other side that were "redacted" but still contained extracted text for the full doc."
That's probably because some moron highlighted in black or used text boxes. That's not redacting. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:44 PM Author: charismatic jet-lagged lodge foreskin Totally plausible, but what if that moron works for you? I have no idea whether or not my junior associates are proficient enough to use redaction tools appropriately, and I'm not going to waste time checking to make sure that they didn't screw up (and I think my firm actually disabled the redaction function in acrobat last year because of this). I just tell them to highlight in Word, change highlights to black, print and then scan. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470883) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:52 PM Author: Ungodly masturbator paralegals should be trained in this.
i say should be because i know even at top firms half of them are useless. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 3:01 PM Author: charismatic jet-lagged lodge foreskin v5 here; i'd put the number at 90% (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35471041) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 3:04 PM Author: Swashbuckling sanctuary sneaky criminal "That's probably because some moron highlighted in black or used text boxes." OMG. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:36 PM Author: diverse cocky bawdyhouse boltzmann Is your claim that Acrobat's redactions don't work? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470812) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:42 PM Author: charismatic jet-lagged lodge foreskin My claim is that I have received more than one PDF that purported to contain electronic redactions, but that retained the text underneath the redaction in some form. In one of the instances that I am thinking of, I saved the PDF as a Word doc and the text was there. In the other, I went to copy text (including the redaction) out of the PDF and into a brief that I was writing, and the redacted text showed up when I hit paste. No idea if the counterparties at issue were using Acrobat, but as a result I do not trust electronic redactions. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470859) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 3:19 PM Author: diverse cocky bawdyhouse boltzmann That's because they're using non-redaction tools to "redact."
I don't see how switching to oxps would solve that. |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 3:22 PM Author: charismatic jet-lagged lodge foreskin Sorry if I wasn't clear, I don't care one way or the other about oxps. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35471221) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:24 PM Author: Swashbuckling sanctuary sneaky criminal OXPS is an XML-based format, which makes creating tools to be used with it much simpler than developing PDF tools. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470722) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:21 PM Author: Ocher pisswyrm library Metadata? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470702) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:28 PM Author: Fantasy-prone alpha crotch Cravath uses LotusNotes (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470757) |
|
Date: February 23rd, 2018 2:47 PM Author: flirting 180 hissy fit (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35470906) |
|
Date: March 3rd, 2018 10:01 AM Author: heady idiot international law enforcement agency (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3901731&forum_id=2#35526147) |