The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Some good new Sotomayor transcript gems from yesterday
Poast new message in this thread
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:43 PM Author: lavender effete french chef (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655201) |
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:44 PM Author: pale vibrant pit I'm fairly sophisticated I'm fairly sophisticated I'm fairly sophisticated I'm fairly sophisticated I'm fairly sophisticated |
 |
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:45 PM Author: fluffy electric furnace (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655215) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:42 PM Author: Trip Locale Psychic Read that as "It's fairly sophisticated" the first time
LOL |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:45 PM Author: cracking magenta theatre (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655795) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:46 PM Author: French Nursing Home Incel Was this part of the record or, as Kennedy implied, did she do her own research? JFC libs explain yourselves. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655225) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:46 PM Author: lavender effete french chef did her own research as far as I can tell (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655231) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:50 PM Author: haunting stage Ends justify the means with libs
They will never criticize her as long as she’s a safe lefty vote |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:24 PM Author: Razzmatazz Range Boltzmann Not to defend TWL, but appellate judges do this kind of shit all the time. Including reptiles, including at SCOTUS. Amicus briefs exist to give the Court a citable source for claims well outside the record even though there is no check on those briefs' accuracy. At the COA level, Posner actively advocated for judges doing their own factual research.
|
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:34 PM Author: floppy bearded trailer park haunted graveyard But Posner is a POS judge. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655688) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:45 PM Author: Disturbing school (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655790) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:36 PM Author: Multi-colored zippy selfie hospital While it is true judges frequently break the rules, it doesn't make me feel better about it. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655702) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:43 PM Author: Razzmatazz Range Boltzmann Whether it breaks the rules depends on the circumstances though. There is a difference between visiting a crime scene to discount eye-witness testimony and going to a website to look at an ad that is at issue in the case. I don't know enough about this case to say whether the information Soto got online was improper or not. There are arguments dating back nearly a century (maybe longer) about what kind of extra-record factual info appellate courts can properly consider. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655769) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:47 PM Author: Multi-colored zippy selfie hospital I wasn't giving a view on the propriety of Sotomayor's research here. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655811) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:50 PM Author: floppy bearded trailer park haunted graveyard There is no guarantee that the ad she looked at is the ad at issue in the case, though. People change their websites. If the ad is *actually* at issue in the case, it will be in the record. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655838) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2021 2:38 PM Author: galvanic national security agency (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#43237122) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:56 PM Author: Iridescent station ratface Both are wrong. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655910) |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 9:43 AM Author: Curious Cuckoldry there was a case about how long it took union members to put on and take off their clothes/uniforms. Posner had his clerks do it and Posner timed them. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35660157) |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 9:45 AM Author: outnumbered adventurous dingle berry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35660171) |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 10:34 AM Author: Curious Cuckoldry #MeTwink (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35660502) |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 9:51 AM Author: Motley sticky mad-dog skullcap fucking garbage. He also reversed a case on the medical standard of care based on what he found on the Mayo Clinic website (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35660215) |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 10:35 AM Author: Curious Cuckoldry almost certainly the news stories about Posner and his public comments were a major reason the ABA issued that new opinion.
also, the MSM are saying that no one batted an eye when Roberts did what Soto just got slapped for. true. but since the Roberts thing, the new opinion came out and all the judges were educated about it. |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 10:55 AM Author: exhilarant disrespectful institution main people lol (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35660638) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:33 PM Author: floppy bearded trailer park haunted graveyard Going outside the record is some bullshit. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655673) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:38 PM Author: Multi-colored zippy selfie hospital Yeah. This includes the frequent refs you see to social science crap since the Brandeis brief, in my view - but as to plainly adjudicative facts, wtf (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655722) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:52 PM Author: floppy bearded trailer park haunted graveyard I don't mind when trial judges bring factual shit up sua sponte, as long as they give you an opportunity to address it with your own evidence, but once the evidentiary record is fixed it's even worse. This isn't "judicial notice" type of stuff. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655863) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:57 PM Author: Iridescent station ratface Thugs in black robes, etc. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655916) |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 9:41 AM Author: Curious Cuckoldry http://www.abajournal.com/images/main_images/FO_478_FINAL_12_07_17.pdf
Formal Opinion 478 December 8, 2017 Independent Factual Research by Judges Via the Internet Easy access to a vast amount of information available on the Internet exposes judges to potential ethical problems. Judges risk violating the Model Code of Judicial Conduct by searching the Internet for information related to participants or facts in a proceeding. Independent investigation of adjudicative facts generally is prohibited unless the information is properly subject to judicial notice. The restriction on independent investigation includes individuals subject to the judge’s direction and control. 1 |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:47 PM Author: Rusted comical jew Roberts barely concealing his contempt for the Wise Latina (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655241) |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 10:37 AM Author: Startled dilemma If a freaking CJOTUSSC is willing to talk like that on the record you can imagine how bad it is behind closed doors. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35660526) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:50 PM Author: Abusive private investor office oh what an exemplary. such anathema. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655278) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:43 PM Author: bespoke chapel (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655771) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 5:52 PM Author: outnumbered adventurous dingle berry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655296) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:31 PM Author: pungent dead cruise ship Lol @ the man who premised his Citizens United opinion on an issue no one raised or briefed lecturing someone else for looking "outside the record." (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655646) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:35 PM Author: floppy bearded trailer park haunted graveyard Those are two unrelated things, and they had reargument on that issue, right? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655697) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:39 PM Author: pungent dead cruise ship More egregious to raise an unbriefed issue than to refer to publicly available tangential facts outside the record during oral argument. Apparently waiver rules mean nothing if Kennedy wants to write a TTT opinion. And I agree with scalia that Kennedy is TTT. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655726) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:54 PM Author: floppy bearded trailer park haunted graveyard Kennedy is absolutely TTT, but if there is an actual dispositive constitutional issue that would render other bases for decision null, I'm not sure if it's wrong to raise that. Maybe I could be convinced otherwise. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655887) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 7:28 PM Author: pungent dead cruise ship Usually SCOTUS says "we avoid broad constitutional rulings if possible."
The bigger issue is that both the "liberal" bloc (in Obergefell) and the "more conservative" bloc (in Citizens United and probably in Janus) sign on to Kennedy's TTT opinions because they need his vote. Apparently he's so thin-skinned that he'd vote the other way if anyone ever called him on his shit. |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:59 PM Author: Iridescent station ratface You can't allow retarded attorneys and technical waiver rules to force the SCOTUS to change the meaning of the Constitution. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655926) |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 9:43 AM Author: Curious Cuckoldry (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35660161) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:41 PM Author: Purple chad (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655740) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:34 PM Author: alcoholic glittery toaster piazza I don't understand. None of this is about working at Nordstrom's (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655685) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:36 PM Author: pale vibrant pit PRORE TERR: calling it Nordstrom's instead of the correct Nordstrom, like "Tiffany's" instead of Tiffany (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655707) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:45 PM Author: cracking magenta theatre Lmao (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655788) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:47 PM Author: autistic disgusting boistinker Sotomayor is like some kind of sick joke, derailing SCOTUS
http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=2160853&forum_id=2 |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 6:55 PM Author: Disturbing school Thomas, J., laying down the law:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=heQjKdHu1P4&t=41m45s |
|
Date: March 22nd, 2018 10:40 AM Author: Trip Locale Psychic (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35660545) |
|
Date: March 21st, 2018 7:00 PM Author: Iridescent station ratface Pure pwnage by Kennedy. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#35655929) |
|
Date: October 7th, 2021 2:35 PM Author: Thriller Chocolate Half-breed (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3924914&forum_id=2#43237109) |