I genuinely dont think women or any male under 30 should be allowed to vote
| infuriating national | 04/17/18 | | infuriating national | 04/17/18 | | Maniacal potus stage | 04/17/18 | | Vibrant Bistre Hell Chad | 04/17/18 | | infuriating national | 04/17/18 | | dashing magical senate mood | 04/17/18 | | Vibrant Bistre Hell Chad | 04/17/18 | | Disgusting onyx telephone headpube | 04/17/18 | | dashing magical senate mood | 04/17/18 | | infuriating national | 04/17/18 | | infuriating national | 04/17/18 | | Vengeful adventurous lodge mediation | 04/17/18 | | bright sneaky criminal | 04/17/18 | | infuriating national | 04/17/18 | | bright sneaky criminal | 04/17/18 | | aggressive pearly range giraffe | 04/17/18 | | infuriating national | 04/17/18 | | Vengeful adventurous lodge mediation | 04/17/18 | | titillating ultramarine stead | 04/17/18 | | big-titted topaz rigor turdskin | 04/17/18 | | odious organic girlfriend | 04/17/18 | | bright sneaky criminal | 04/17/18 | | amber duck-like dopamine | 04/17/18 | | infuriating national | 04/17/18 | | dashing magical senate mood | 04/17/18 | | Arousing state | 04/17/18 | | infuriating national | 04/19/18 | | infuriating national | 04/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 17th, 2018 2:35 AM Author: infuriating national
I can’t think of one valid argument for allowing it other than men under 30 in Armed forces and they can be allowed to vote 21 and up.
Cr, no?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3951377&forum_id=2#35857231) |
Date: April 17th, 2018 2:52 PM Author: amber duck-like dopamine
you can go on creating caveats until the end of time once you start down this road (no one under 30, over 60, taxpayers only, landowners only, etc).
simplest thing is just to say Men Only. at least at that point, the argument/discourse FUNDAMENTALLY changes.
arguments among MEN can be relied on to come to some sort of reasonable conclusion, usually. men will defer to superior reason; they are hierarchical, less buckwild and passionate. it's only when the aims of political discourse are diffused by the participation of women (and that diffusion is stoked by agitating [[[parties]]]) that things become total chaos/confusion.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3951377&forum_id=2#35860855) |
|
|