After his last reason was stripped, rather than admit he was foolish to engage in his temper tantrum, he shitmodded the thread and deleted it from the garbage board so that no one could see.

After getting called out for being a shitmod by EVERYONE present in that thread (we all saw what BLP did), BLP lied about his actions, claiming he shitmodded to protect Benzo. Here is Benzo's reaction to BLP's "protection":

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954439&mc=11&forum_id=2

Oh, and prior to the shitmodding, as BLP was getting gaped, TSINAH asked BLP if he was going to shitmod the thread, because BLP has apparently shitmodded threads in the past that started going against him. Like clockwork, within 20 seconds, BLP did just that. These two threads are contemporaneous records of BLP's shitmodding:

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954441&mc=27&forum_id=2

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954438&mc=48&forum_id=2

The facts that:

1. BLP shitmodded a thread solely because he was gaped and embarrassed inside it (again, no one who was there agrees with BLP that the thread violated the One Rule; this is a self-serving fig leaf that BLP has offered in his defense);

2. BLP apparently is so bad that his shitmodding was able to be accurately predicted by TSINAH; and

3. BLP continues to lie about his actions.

All demonstrate beyond a reasonable doubt that BLP is temperamentally unfit to be a mod.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35880346)

couldn't remember

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35880606)

TSINAH responsed by linking to a thread where Benzo allegedly outed him. Basically after that, BLP would keep pivoting in an attempt to validate his initial hissy fit, but kept getting shut down by TSINAH. Finally, TSINAH said I bet you’re going to shitmod this thread now that you’ve been gaped, and that’s exactly what BLP did.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35881723)

Edit: this was for a different thread

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35882952)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35883681)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954491&mc=7&forum_id=2#35879652

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35883894)

fucking libs, all the same.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884208)

I’m extremely confident that BLP abused his mod powers as I described.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35883928)

it's funny because lawman8 bears a grudge against blp for defending short quotemo w/r/t the secret slack.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35883720)

It is easy to accidentally delete poasts (which you can then restore) but impossible for threads since rach added a pop up that you have to verify before a thread can be deleted.

That’s not the subject of this shitstorm. He is being skewered for abuse of mod powers for shitmodding an entire thread because he was getting embarrassed. Further, he didn’t just delete the thread (virtually impossible to do by accident), he went onto the garbage board and deleted the thread there too, to cover up the evidence.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35883867)

The fig leaf that BLP is holding onto is that TSINAH asked Benzo if he cried when “Officer G” arrested him (that was the thread name). It was explained to BLP in the thread that you cannot do a search for “officer G” and find out somebody’s identity. Moreover, TSINAH linked to a thread where Benzo poasted about the arrest in question.

You tell me if you think “officer G” warrants a total nuking of the thread, particularly as BLP began to look dumber and dumber inside.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35883999)

This is completely out of your league if you want me to be honest with you. I'll take the L in getting involved like this. Even though they call me No L's so it's technically impossible. But I respect you too much so I'll do that for you. I'm done here. My previous posts should be considered redacted, except for the President post I made. You can do whatever you want I don't care.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884046)

However, TSINAH predicted BLP would be shitmodding, so obviously he has done this in the past. I’m just not aware of it. Someone else can fill in those gaps.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884064)

I think that restoring the thread will allow people to see just how full of it he is. Officer G is not personally identifiable information at all.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884089)

In fact, not one person has expressed outrage at my nuking that thread about TSINAH's Alma mater, but an entire army is up in arms that I nuked a thread with benzo's info. What gives, hm?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884123)

You don’t seem very apologetic...

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884130)

But TSINAH responded that he created the thread because Benzo had made a thread exposing his personal details. And, after Benzo was “protected” he proceeded to laugh about what he himself called shitmodding.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884167)

A note ahead of our next conference: if we are to address discipline, which of course is within your sole discretion, I would advocate leniency notwithstanding lawman8's denunciation of me as his ally, as he has, for the most, been a good addition to our team and has handled himself well.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884241)

XO can be the collective judge if BLP has abused his mod power or not. Did the thread violate the ONE RULE? Or, did BLP delete it because he started looking like a fool??

Want me to go through the screenshotting and uploading process?

EDIT: Ok, the link is ready. Please note that this is only 80% of the thread. It continued on with one or two more BLP exchanges with TSINAH. It got worse and that is not reflected.

But the catalyst was TSINAH saying now that you�ve been gaped, I bet you�re gong to shitmod this entire thread. BLP then proceeded to do just that, which pissed us all off. These poasts are missing and if I refresh, the whole page will be gone.

XO, what�s the verdict??

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884098)

personal info, thread is available for shitmodding. it's always a judgment call as to what constitutes information that will out someone but the thread in question is not outrageous to delete

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35885189)

but it's also true that your crusade against blp is more motivated by the crypto slack than is a principled stance against shitmodding.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884415)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954446&mc=17&forum_id=2

With that said, I admit that I wouldn’t have been so vocal on this issue had BLP not had a meltdown about the exposure of the secret slack. That doesn’t make a single word I said untrue. I don’t think a mod who shitmods, and in fact does it often enough that it can be predicted, should be a mod.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884508)

But, in addition to the shitmodding, what really set people off was BLP’s lies about what happened (he thought since he had destroyed the evidence no one could prove what he did). Here’s a representative example:

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954467&mc=56&forum_id=2#35879479

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884862)

How can you support a mod who admits making similar abuses in the past (you agree this was an abuse), and vows to do so again in the future?

There’s only ONE RULE here, and BLP has demonstrated he doesn’t appreciate what it means.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35884969)

BLP characterizes the nuked thread as containing “outable info.” In fact, the objective truth is that it contains no such thing.

This isn’t open to interpretation and is black and white. One quite simply cannot discover someone’s identity with “officer g.”

Therefore, BLP has demonstrated he has no understanding of what the ONE RULE actually is.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35885083)

Also, in a tremendous irony, BLP’s actions that demonstrated he’s unfit to be a mod may have made Benzo’s IRL immeasurably worse, if this is to be believed:

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954559&mc=37&forum_id=2#35885283

BLP’s cowardly conduct directly sparked the massive brouhaha last night that led to this.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35885636)

and tsinah is being an idiot about it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35885708)

Very shortly after, you changed it to some OH SHIT! type of poast, implying TSINAH told you his plans and then blanked it. Your reaction was trolling others into thinking he mentioned some dastardly plan, and I approved. It was clever.

That is not in any sense any kind of judgment as to the merits of how “real” this whole thing is. I think that TSINAH is being dead serious, and this is all real.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886152)

it would be far more honest of you to say you dislike blp because he sided with someone who snubbed you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886130)

Regarding your second incorrect charge, I’ve fully admitted that I’ve only been so vocal about this because I don’t like BLP. That does not warrant the false inference you seek; that he’s innocent under your tortured logic.

Think of me as an opportunist. I wait for the right opportunity, when I’m 100% right, and then pounce. And I don’t pounce on those I like. Here, BLP is objectively a shitmod who doesn’t understand the ONE RULE that we have (not your fake two rules). He should not be a mod. If I liked him, I’d merely remain silent. He still wouldn’t deserve to be a mod, but I’d leave that cause for others to argue.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886172)

I conclusively rebutted the various fallacious arguments and tortured logic you’ve presented here - including your unilateral attempt to manufacture a second bort rule out of wholecloth - and this is how you respond? Putting words in my mouth and a snide dismissal?

Surely you can do better than that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886347)

is spamming allowed or not?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886358)

I understand your point though. You are trying to claim that there are unwritten rules, and your attempt to manufacture the fake second rule is one such example.

But that’s contrary to both the way things work here (Rach makes the rules) along with the spirit of the bort (moderation is almost always discouraged). The fake second rule you’d propose (but pretend is already in place) would impermissibly broaden the scope of the ONE RULE and sanction way too much shitmodding.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886385)

But, let me indulge you. Let's pretend that there are actually several rules. Your fake one, "a piece of info that isn't outable in isolation can be combined with other similar pieces of info to out or harass IRL" isn't one of them. As I said, it's contrary both to how things actually work here, along with the spirit of the bort. It is entirely too vague, for starters.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886422)

But you are sticking your head in the sand to pretend that more than one rule existing is enough proof that BLP is not a shitmod. Not to mention you've contradicted your original position, which is that he never should have completely nuked that thread. Now, under this rule you've fabricated, it's ok.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886452)

http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35885189

i did say i don't think blp should have deleted that thread. i didn't say "he never should have completely nuked that thread." i wouldn't have deleted it if i were a mod. but that isn't to say i don't think a decent argument can be made for modding it. it's a judgment call with what i see as valid competing arguments.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886479)

When you delete a thread, it goes onto the garbage board, where others can see it, but can't poast. Although I don't think that thread deserved to be deleted at all, I wouldn't be making such a fuss if that's all that happened.

BLP went one step further, and deleted the thread from the garbage board. Rach tells you this is something you are basically never supposed to do. BLP only did it to cover up the evidence of him getting embarrassed in that thread.

There is absolutely no excuse for it. And while I completely disagree with your assessment that it's a judgment call to begin with, even if it was, that is only in the context as to whether the thread should have been deleted, as opposed to completely nuked.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886503)

also, let's say that ohnoes bears a grudge against you. would you say that he opportunistically pounced on you?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886541)

Here, I am biased but also right. As I said, Rach tells you basically never to completely nuke a thread. Deciding to do so over something like "officer G" is comically over the line.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886548)

But this is an interesting tidbit. Could it be that your opinion ITT has been shaped by your strong like for ohnoes, and (the common) subconscious desire to agree with those you strongly like?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886570)

i poasted this before ohnoes chimed in, so no, not in this case.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35886582)

all these threads should be reinstated in full so that we can have a complete evidential record

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35885713)

http://www.xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954467&mc=56&forum_id=2#35879479

And I agree a complete evidential record would be better.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3954585&forum_id=2#35885781)