The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
NLRB: Rules google was right to fire Doore. Must nip thoughtcrime in the bud
| passionate market dysfunction | 04/22/18 |
| laughsome umber rigpig patrolman | 04/22/18 |
| Irradiated Violet Double Fault | 04/22/18 |
| frozen lascivious whorehouse | 04/22/18 |
| soul-stirring partner liquid oxygen | 04/22/18 |
| Irradiated Violet Double Fault | 04/22/18 |
| Topaz cerebral famous landscape painting hairy legs | 04/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: April 22nd, 2018 10:22 AM Author: passionate market dysfunction https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/16/17021714/james-damore-google-nlrb-complaint-diversity-discrimination
In her analysis, Sophir writes that employers should be given “particular deference” in trying to enforce anti-discrimination and anti-harassment policies, since these are tied to legal requirements. And employers have “a strong interest in promoting diversity” and cooperation across different groups of people. Because of this, “employers must be permitted to ‘nip in the bud’ the kinds of employee conduct that could lead to a ‘hostile workplace,’” she writes. “Where an employee’s conduct significantly disrupts work processes, creates a hostile work environment, or constitutes racial or sexual discrimination or harassment, the Board has found it unprotected even if it involves concerted activities regarding working conditions.” |
Date: April 22nd, 2018 10:25 AM Author: laughsome umber rigpig patrolman Lol so a career (deep state) NLRB staffer wrote the memo at a time when the Board was deadlocked 2-2 what a shock (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3956421&forum_id=2#35893327) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2018 10:36 AM Author: Irradiated Violet Double Fault If you disagree with this result, you’re a shitlib who thinks the NLRA protects anything and everything in the workplace. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3956421&forum_id=2#35893361) |
 |
Date: April 22nd, 2018 10:45 AM Author: frozen lascivious whorehouse exactly. this result affirms the proper NLRA policy of protecting anything and everything other than fuckin white males (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3956421&forum_id=2#35893397) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2018 11:27 AM Author: soul-stirring partner liquid oxygen Perhaps, but that doesn't prevent people from pointing out the ridiculous reasoning in this opinion.
Given the circumstances, this is the equivalent of letting a 90% white company fire a nigger that is causing trouble to prevent a hostile work environment. |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2018 12:20 PM Author: Irradiated Violet Double Fault The NLRA doesn’t protect niggers or political opinions. That’s the whole point. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3956421&forum_id=2#35893808) |
|
Date: April 22nd, 2018 10:43 AM Author: Topaz cerebral famous landscape painting hairy legs “Where an employee’s conduct significantly disrupts work processes, creates a hostile work environment, or constitutes racial or sexual discrimination or harassment, the Board has found it unprotected even if it involves concerted activities regarding working conditions.”
tl;dr: free speech about working conditions is a threat to free speech about working conditions. |