1) hewitt went wire to wire in 2002, and lost it to andre in april

2) andre held who held it for 2 weeks in april-may, and then gave it back to hewitt

3) hewitt held it for 5 weeks in may-june and then gave it back to andre after RG

4) andre held it throughout the summer before giving it to JCF after the USO

5) JCF held it for 8 weeks in the fall before giving it to roddick in november, who ended the year #1 and held it until fed took it in feb 2004

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974604&forum_id=2#36070706)

roddick's USO win was coupled with SFs and W and AO, plus two masters wins, and WTF SF

seems like roddick had an overall better year at the bigger events and it makes sense.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974604&forum_id=2#36070783)

i do think winning a 250/500 should be worth more. there should be more of an emphasis on WINNING

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974604&forum_id=2#36070814)

The 250/500 events, and especially the 250s, are more for the guys ranked 50-150 imo

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974604&forum_id=2#36070829)

https://www.tennisworldusa.org/tennis/news/Roger_Federer/56560/roger-federer-and-rafael-nadal-are-the-first-to-achieve-this-in-17-years/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974604&forum_id=2#36277333)

ljl at this logic. how's it different if he won stuttgart vs lost in the r16 of rome

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974604&forum_id=2#36277412)

Stuttgart he would have played anyway so no issue there.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974604&forum_id=2#36277549)

now lance can retain #1 with another R16 performance at wimby even if fed wins. had fed won halle, lance would have needed QF

**

Nah I think we're good from here on out breh (ironside)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3974604&forum_id=2#36300680)