If Hitler had only pursued Buelow's foreign policy aims, does he succeed?
| blathering psychic | 05/23/18 | | blathering psychic | 05/23/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 23rd, 2018 11:31 AM Author: blathering psychic
>> In a meeting with German military leaders on 3 February 1933, Hitler spoke of "conquest for Lebensraum in the East and its ruthless Germanisation" as his ultimate foreign policy objectives.[194] In March, Prince Bernhard Wilhelm von Bülow, secretary at the Auswärtiges Amt (Foreign Office), issued a statement of major foreign policy aims: Anschluss with Austria, the restoration of Germany's national borders of 1914, rejection of military restrictions under the Treaty of Versailles, the return of the former German colonies in Africa, and a German zone of influence in Eastern Europe. Hitler found Bülow's goals to be too modest.[195] In speeches during this period, he stressed the peaceful goals of his policies and a willingness to work within international agreements.[196] At the first meeting of his cabinet in 1933, Hitler prioritised military spending over unemployment relief.[197] <<
If he only tried to achieve Bülow's objectives, and then afterward dealt with domestic issues, how does world history change? Is Hitler far more successful? Is there eventually a German civil war or revolution?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984550&forum_id=2#36111425) |
|
|