\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

If only the CIA had embedded an informant into Hillary's campaign

Maybe then Russia wouldn't have convinced her to ignore Mich...
Supple Hilarious Public Bath
  05/23/18
...
Supple Hilarious Public Bath
  05/23/18
the FBI was already investigating hillary. so was congress. ...
useless hot meetinghouse round eye
  05/23/18
That wasn't an investigation. It was a matter. And it's p...
Supple Hilarious Public Bath
  05/23/18
lol the FBI literally used an informant too (back when using...
useless hot meetinghouse round eye
  05/23/18
"Campbell worked as an FBI undercover informant from 20...
Supple Hilarious Public Bath
  05/23/18
it had to do directly with HER, and not merely her campaign ...
useless hot meetinghouse round eye
  05/23/18
Ok, well my OP said campaign. The IC is arguing that they p...
Supple Hilarious Public Bath
  05/23/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2018 12:27 PM
Author: Supple Hilarious Public Bath

Maybe then Russia wouldn't have convinced her to ignore Michigan and Wisconsin. Sad!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984597&forum_id=2#36111810)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2018 12:36 PM
Author: Supple Hilarious Public Bath



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984597&forum_id=2#36111900)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2018 12:37 PM
Author: useless hot meetinghouse round eye

the FBI was already investigating hillary. so was congress. what else you got?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984597&forum_id=2#36111914)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2018 12:38 PM
Author: Supple Hilarious Public Bath

That wasn't an investigation. It was a matter.

And it's pretty clear at this point they weren't actually investigating her. What else YOU got?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984597&forum_id=2#36111921)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2018 12:39 PM
Author: useless hot meetinghouse round eye

lol the FBI literally used an informant too (back when using informants was OK):

"An FBI informant involved in the controversial Uranium One deal has told congressional committees that Moscow paid millions to a U.S. lobbying firm in a bid to influence then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by helping former President Bill Clinton’s charities during the Obama administration."

http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2018/02/08/informant-says-moscow-paid-millions-in-bid-to-influence-clinton.html

lol you're done here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984597&forum_id=2#36111935)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2018 12:44 PM
Author: Supple Hilarious Public Bath

"Campbell worked as an FBI undercover informant from 2008 through 2014 inside Russia’s nuclear industry, helping to uncover a bribery, kickback, money laundering and extortion scheme that sent several Russian and U.S. executives to prison."

What does that have to do with HER campaign?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984597&forum_id=2#36111967)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2018 12:46 PM
Author: useless hot meetinghouse round eye

it had to do directly with HER, and not merely her campaign

"An FBI informant involved in the controversial Uranium One deal has told congressional committees that Moscow paid millions to a U.S. lobbying firm in a bid to influence then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton by helping former President Bill Clinton’s charities during the Obama administration."

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984597&forum_id=2#36111981)



Reply Favorite

Date: May 23rd, 2018 12:53 PM
Author: Supple Hilarious Public Bath

Ok, well my OP said campaign. The IC is arguing that they put an "informant" in Trump's campaign for his own protection and to protect against Russian interference. If that was the case, why didn't they offer the same "protection" to Hillary's campaign? Your "counterargument" has absolutely zero to do with any of that. She was SoS years before she campaigned.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3984597&forum_id=2#36112018)