Creating conflict between insurance defense attorneys and the adjusters
| White Ticket Booth | 05/26/18 | | Puce Church Building | 05/26/18 | | Honey-headed odious abode stain | 05/26/18 | | White Ticket Booth | 05/26/18 | | erotic up-to-no-good persian | 05/26/18 | | Azure international law enforcement agency | 05/28/18 | | rambunctious buck-toothed public bath rigor | 05/29/18 | | erotic up-to-no-good persian | 05/26/18 | | metal striped hyena | 05/28/18 | | erotic up-to-no-good persian | 05/29/18 | | White Ticket Booth | 05/27/18 | | cheese-eating hospital | 05/27/18 | | White Ticket Booth | 05/28/18 | | White Ticket Booth | 05/28/18 | | Azure international law enforcement agency | 05/28/18 | | White Ticket Booth | 05/28/18 | | hairraiser shimmering laser beams | 05/28/18 | | Spectacular Territorial Boiling Water Space | 05/28/18 | | White Ticket Booth | 05/28/18 | | turquoise internal respiration | 05/28/18 | | erotic up-to-no-good persian | 05/29/18 | | cheese-eating hospital | 05/29/18 | | Disgusting Box Office | 05/29/18 | | disrespectful maize site | 05/29/18 | | Buff Feces | 05/29/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 26th, 2018 7:30 PM Author: White Ticket Booth
One of the things I want to master as a plaintiff lawyer is to create discomfort between the ID attorneys, the adjusters and the clients.
I received an email from an ID attorney on Friday morning that was specifically designed to protect the insurance company and expose her client to potentially unlimited liability. I want to expose this in my response and make it so that this attorney is forced to cave to our demand or recuse herself from the case. Her letter was so strongly drafted to protect the insurance company that it explicitly twisted my words and tries to imply something I didn’t even say.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36133177) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2018 4:28 PM Author: Azure international law enforcement agency
Something plaintiff bros do where I practice is include a brief narrative in this type of letter where the insured was relieved of his duty to cooperate under the policy due to a conflict created by coverage issues. They specifically mention the name of the friendly plaintiffs attorney that stepped in to "defend" the insured during the setup of the insurance company. They also mention that the insured actually realized a nice little recovery on the bad faith claim.
They do this to provide the insured a step-by-step guide on what they need to do to get their own attorney, and by including the name of the attorney from the other case that represented the defendant, they not so subtly suggest who the insured should contact. Obviously, the same strategy can be used during the insured's deposition.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36141036)
|
|
|