Creating conflict between insurance defense attorneys and the adjusters
| Indecent gaping center | 05/26/18 | | unholy sex offender | 05/26/18 | | Drunken Station Dopamine | 05/26/18 | | Indecent gaping center | 05/26/18 | | Thriller Primrose Plaza | 05/26/18 | | bronze beady-eyed filthpig senate | 05/28/18 | | sexy hall | 05/29/18 | | Thriller Primrose Plaza | 05/26/18 | | arousing azn | 05/28/18 | | Thriller Primrose Plaza | 05/29/18 | | Indecent gaping center | 05/27/18 | | Lascivious poppy chapel | 05/27/18 | | Indecent gaping center | 05/28/18 | | Indecent gaping center | 05/28/18 | | bronze beady-eyed filthpig senate | 05/28/18 | | Indecent gaping center | 05/28/18 | | lavender keepsake machete clown | 05/28/18 | | excitant confused resort fat ankles | 05/28/18 | | Indecent gaping center | 05/28/18 | | copper goyim | 05/28/18 | | Thriller Primrose Plaza | 05/29/18 | | Lascivious poppy chapel | 05/29/18 | | Claret patrolman | 05/29/18 | | Shaky Sapphire Business Firm | 05/29/18 | | Mustard dashing giraffe | 05/29/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 26th, 2018 7:30 PM Author: Indecent gaping center
One of the things I want to master as a plaintiff lawyer is to create discomfort between the ID attorneys, the adjusters and the clients.
I received an email from an ID attorney on Friday morning that was specifically designed to protect the insurance company and expose her client to potentially unlimited liability. I want to expose this in my response and make it so that this attorney is forced to cave to our demand or recuse herself from the case. Her letter was so strongly drafted to protect the insurance company that it explicitly twisted my words and tries to imply something I didn’t even say.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36133177) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2018 4:28 PM Author: bronze beady-eyed filthpig senate
Something plaintiff bros do where I practice is include a brief narrative in this type of letter where the insured was relieved of his duty to cooperate under the policy due to a conflict created by coverage issues. They specifically mention the name of the friendly plaintiffs attorney that stepped in to "defend" the insured during the setup of the insurance company. They also mention that the insured actually realized a nice little recovery on the bad faith claim.
They do this to provide the insured a step-by-step guide on what they need to do to get their own attorney, and by including the name of the attorney from the other case that represented the defendant, they not so subtly suggest who the insured should contact. Obviously, the same strategy can be used during the insured's deposition.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36141036)
|
|
|