Creating conflict between insurance defense attorneys and the adjusters
| Rebellious abode | 05/26/18 | | snowy beady-eyed hospital queen of the night | 05/26/18 | | galvanic sanctuary | 05/26/18 | | Rebellious abode | 05/26/18 | | Sticky salmon principal's office round eye | 05/26/18 | | Sick silver generalized bond church building | 05/28/18 | | Vibrant rigpig | 05/29/18 | | Sticky salmon principal's office round eye | 05/26/18 | | ruddy foreskin | 05/28/18 | | Sticky salmon principal's office round eye | 05/29/18 | | Rebellious abode | 05/27/18 | | Opaque soul-stirring shrine | 05/27/18 | | Rebellious abode | 05/28/18 | | Rebellious abode | 05/28/18 | | Sick silver generalized bond church building | 05/28/18 | | Rebellious abode | 05/28/18 | | fishy library | 05/28/18 | | Rose Rough-skinned Brunch | 05/28/18 | | Rebellious abode | 05/28/18 | | Swollen Crackhouse | 05/28/18 | | Sticky salmon principal's office round eye | 05/29/18 | | Opaque soul-stirring shrine | 05/29/18 | | Crusty carnelian theater stage | 05/29/18 | | big vengeful potus piazza | 05/29/18 | | shaky bearded headpube | 05/29/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 26th, 2018 7:30 PM Author: Rebellious abode
One of the things I want to master as a plaintiff lawyer is to create discomfort between the ID attorneys, the adjusters and the clients.
I received an email from an ID attorney on Friday morning that was specifically designed to protect the insurance company and expose her client to potentially unlimited liability. I want to expose this in my response and make it so that this attorney is forced to cave to our demand or recuse herself from the case. Her letter was so strongly drafted to protect the insurance company that it explicitly twisted my words and tries to imply something I didn’t even say.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36133177) |
|
Date: May 28th, 2018 4:28 PM Author: Sick silver generalized bond church building
Something plaintiff bros do where I practice is include a brief narrative in this type of letter where the insured was relieved of his duty to cooperate under the policy due to a conflict created by coverage issues. They specifically mention the name of the friendly plaintiffs attorney that stepped in to "defend" the insured during the setup of the insurance company. They also mention that the insured actually realized a nice little recovery on the bad faith claim.
They do this to provide the insured a step-by-step guide on what they need to do to get their own attorney, and by including the name of the attorney from the other case that represented the defendant, they not so subtly suggest who the insured should contact. Obviously, the same strategy can be used during the insured's deposition.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3987270&forum_id=2#36141036)
|
|
|