The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
:D, why not fish
| Navy alcoholic trust fund | 05/27/18 |
| Fishy Abode Cuckoldry | 05/27/18 |
| Navy alcoholic trust fund | 05/27/18 |
| Fishy Abode Cuckoldry | 05/27/18 |
| Fishy Abode Cuckoldry | 05/27/18 |
| gaped elite range | 05/27/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: May 27th, 2018 11:46 PM Author: Navy alcoholic trust fund (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3988009&forum_id=2#36138465) |
Date: May 27th, 2018 11:47 PM Author: Fishy Abode Cuckoldry industrial pollutants are extremely bad even at small doses and very long lasting in the body like decades https://nutritionfacts.org/video/how-long-to-detox-from-fish-before-pregnancy/ |
 |
Date: May 27th, 2018 11:49 PM Author: Navy alcoholic trust fund is that the only reason (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3988009&forum_id=2#36138473) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2018 11:51 PM Author: Fishy Abode Cuckoldry They are also the most acidic food so they trash your kidneys. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3988009&forum_id=2#36138478) |
|
Date: May 27th, 2018 11:51 PM Author: Fishy Abode Cuckoldry But, with a two-month half-life, within a year of stopping fish consumption, your body can detox nearly 99% of the mercury. Unfortunately, the other industrial pollutants in fish can take longer for our body to get rid of—a half life as long as ten years for certain dioxins, and PBCs, and DDT metabolites found in fish. So, to get that same 99% drop could take 120 years, which is a long time to delay one’s first child.
What do these other pollutants do? Well, high concentrations of industrial contaminants are associated with 38 times the odds of diabetes. That’s as strong as the relationship between smoking and lung cancer! Isn’t diabetes mostly about obesity, though? Well, these are fat-soluble pollutants, and so, “[a]s people get fatter, the retention and toxicity of [persistent organic pollutants] related to the risk of diabetes may increase,” suggesting the “shocking” possibility that “obesity [may only be] a vehicle for such chemicals.” We may be storing pollutants in our spare tire, like a hazardous waste dump.
Now, the pollutants could just be a marker of animal product consumption. Maybe that’s why there’s such higher diabetes risk, since more than 90% of the persistent organic pollutants comes from animal foods—unless you work in a chemical factory, or stumble across some toxic waste. And, indeed, in the U.S., every serving of fish a week is associated with a 5% increased risk of diabetes—which makes fish consumption about 80% worse than red meat. |
|
Date: May 27th, 2018 11:56 PM Author: gaped elite range (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=3988009&forum_id=2#36138499) |