https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/06/18/nyregion/18conservativewomen/18conservativewomen-superJumbo.jpg

https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/06/18/nyregion/18conservativewomen-05/merlin_139690953_6d415e65-b4ac-4901-8ce9-89a64fbba078-superJumbo.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004147&forum_id=2#36261619)

https://ibb.co/cd8b9d

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004147&forum_id=2#36261740)

Just going to highlight one paragraph as an excellent example of how the (((NYT))) spins ostensibly "objective" reporting:

"At the conference, Natalia Mittelstadt, 20, said #MeToo may be turning in to 'McCarthyism,' though she also said it was great that women were speaking out about their negative experiences."

>>> Notice how nuanced thought (which the Left claims to prize) is easily twisted into inconsistency and backpedaling here? Here's how the same sentence reads if the ordering of the ideas presented is simply reversed: "At the conference, Natalia Mittelstadt, 20, said that although it was great that women were speaking out about their negative experiences, #MeToo may be turning in to 'McCarthyism.'"

"Nafisa Kabir, a 20-year-old Bangladeshi immigrant set to receive her American citizenship in two weeks, spoke of her desire to see immigration curbed 'because a bunch of added people doesn’t make things better.'"

>>> Oh, what a hypocrite! Let's laugh at this Aunt Thomasina and dismiss her sad idiocy out of hand! (Pay no mind to the fact that (1) she clearly went through the entire burdensome process of immigrating and become a citizen *legally*--unlike 100% of the illegals she opposes; (2) it is perfectly rational for a naturalized American who loves her country to advocate for stringent immigration policies in order to protect the interests of American citizens; and (3) there is absolutely no indication that she would fail to satisfy whatever standard she might be proposing to tighten immigration policies--the substance of which we don't learn anything about from this article, of course.)

"One 17-year-old wearing a 'Make America Great Again' hat said she doubted the widely accepted statistic that one in four college women experience rape or attempted rape — but if it was true, the reason was because 'we’re importing rape culture' through illegal immigration and homosexuality."

>>> Make sure to note that she's 17 and thus a dumb kid who doesn't know shit about the real world (but cf. the high-school-hooting-survivors-turned-gun-control-advocates, who are all brave and wise).

>>> Make sure to note that she's wearing a MAGA hat, so we can all roll our eyes (because this sartorial choice is totally newsworthy and obviously distinguishes her from every other attendee at this conference).

>>> "Widely accepted" = You want a citation? What are you, a bigot?

>>> "But if it was true" = She doesn't really know shit, just like these other dumb young conservatards (but cf. when Leftists use this same line, at which it transforms into the sophisticated rhetorical device of "arguing in the alternative")

>>> "Importing rape culture through immigration" = so ridiculous on it's face what is there to even say! (But of course they carefully avoid asking her what cultures she's thinking of... or providing any statistics on the per capita number of rapes committed in America by Muslim immigrants and/or Mexican illegal immigrants... or noting that Sweden and Germany have both suffered a well-documented rise in sexual assaults on women that are directly tied to immigrant populations... or noting the Paki-centered "grooming" problem that has now become epidemic throughout Britain...)

"'The most important thing we need to do is build the wall,' said the teenager, Morgan Tapley."

> "Said the teenager" = Just close your eyes and try to imagine the NYT *ever* using this phrase to describe Young Voice of a Generation(TM) David Hogg.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004147&forum_id=2#36261720)

NYT is done. NYT has BEEN done, for a long time.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004147&forum_id=2#36261734)

Ms. Owens, who skyrocketed to national fame after helping shepherd rap artist Kanye West through his transition from liberal social activist to a vocal supporter of Mr. Trump, received significant blowback recently after she tweeted that “the entire premise of #metoo is that women are stupid, weak, & inconsequential.”

Ms. Owens has yet to apologize publicly, and she did not do so explicitly at the young women’s conference. Nevertheless, she was greeted with a standing ovation before her speech Saturday afternoon, smiling as a song from Mr. West’s new album played quietly in the background.

“We’re all with you, Candace!” a young woman screamed from the crowd.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004147&forum_id=2#36262821)

https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=441499789585884&set=a.121285498273983.1073741827.100011775997726&type=3

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004147&forum_id=2#36262026)

jfc 180^180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004147&forum_id=2#36263832)