\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Anyone read the Expert Reports in the Harvard AA case?

Here is the most egregious error in David Card's analysis: ...
Underhanded self-absorbed pocket flask party of the first part
  06/18/18
He also doesn't separate legacies and recruited athletes fro...
fighting school cafeteria laser beams
  06/22/18
...
fighting school cafeteria laser beams
  06/24/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: June 18th, 2018 11:57 AM
Author: Underhanded self-absorbed pocket flask party of the first part

Here is the most egregious error in David Card's analysis:

"Professor Card includes the personal rating in many of his analyses,

despite clear evidence that this rating is affected by racial preferences.

Professor Card includes Harvard’s personal rating in his models—notwithstanding

the clear finding yielded by my analysis (and that of OIR) that this rating shows

strong evidence of racial bias. "

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004647&forum_id=2#36265234)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 22nd, 2018 1:19 AM
Author: fighting school cafeteria laser beams

He also doesn't separate legacies and recruited athletes from the other applicants.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004647&forum_id=2#36288729)



Reply Favorite

Date: June 24th, 2018 2:00 AM
Author: fighting school cafeteria laser beams



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4004647&forum_id=2#36299881)