Hypothesis: Tennis/Golf Players Value Overall Titles More Than "Analysts"/Fans
| Sadistic casino pozpig | 06/20/18 | | hilarious public bath | 06/20/18 | | Sadistic casino pozpig | 06/20/18 | | hilarious public bath | 06/20/18 | | Sadistic casino pozpig | 06/20/18 | | hilarious public bath | 06/20/18 | | Sadistic casino pozpig | 06/20/18 | | bespoke theatre reading party | 06/20/18 | | hilarious public bath | 06/20/18 | | bespoke theatre reading party | 06/20/18 | | Sadistic casino pozpig | 06/20/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 20th, 2018 6:01 PM Author: Sadistic casino pozpig
i think the players themselves are competitive and love to win and they value overall title count more than the "analysts" and the fans do. my theory is that just being in the winner's circle of a no-name tourney carries a lot more weight to the players than how overall titles is evaluated when guys are compared.
gasgay has 15 singles titles (all 250s), and has never gotten to a slam final and is career high #7.
how many of these singles titles would he give up for a slam final or top 5?
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4006741&forum_id=2#36280552) |
Date: June 20th, 2018 6:05 PM Author: hilarious public bath
i think American fans in particular are fixated on only the biggest title possible.
like for example, nobody in the USA cares about a team that finishes first during the regular season if they don't win the championship, even though objectively being the best team during the season is a huge accomplishment.
ditto trading 4 world championships for an olympic gold.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4006741&forum_id=2#36280576) |
|
|