Date: June 22nd, 2018 4:02 PM
Author: Canary lettuce senate
it's not a "detail" you retarded prole. judges call it the red brief and the blue brief, and so do experienced federal appellate lawyers.
e.g., paul clement -- see https://ccrjustice.org/sites/default/files/attach/2018/03/10-11-17_Transcript-SCOTUS-oral-argument.pdf
JUSTICE KAGAN: Do you think that
joint and several liability -- I mean, that's
also an American concept, would that have to be
accepted by every country in the world?
MR. CLEMENT: I don't know that it
would, because I think the concept of joint and
several liability might get you closer to a
remedial question.
I do think whether or not a
corporation is directly liable under
international law is a question that should be
answered at step 1. And I think it's important
to recognize that if you say corporations are
liable, then you sort of have to answer the
question of, well, how?
And on that, it's not just Judge
Heritage Reporting Corporation
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
56
Official
Posner, if you look at the financing
convention, this is the other thing that's very
interesting about Article V of the financing
convention, and the relevant part is on page 31
of the red brief, but it actually addresses the
circumstances in which a corporation could be
liable under domestic law for a terrorist
financed violation and it does not apply the
American concept of respondeat superior, such
that the master is responsible for every act of
the agent within the scope of agency.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008196&forum_id=2#36292319)