The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Got a motion in limine today without a single cite to a legal standard or casela
| learning disabled marvelous piazza | 06/22/18 |
| Fragrant boiling water | 06/22/18 |
| razzle-dazzle rose brunch | 06/22/18 |
| Insanely Creepy Old Irish Cottage Giraffe | 06/22/18 |
| charismatic tan dilemma | 06/22/18 |
| learning disabled marvelous piazza | 06/22/18 |
| french cerebral tanning salon | 06/22/18 |
| Adventurous school round eye | 06/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:09 PM Author: learning disabled marvelous piazza w in the argument. There is a legal standard section, but none of those rules show up in the argument.
I really don't know where to start. |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:10 PM Author: Fragrant boiling water attack the merits with your own case law and provide the standard and why plaintiff never met it, then mention plaintiff provided no legal reason for the relief sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293063) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:12 PM Author: razzle-dazzle rose brunch I make up my own law for MIL all the time. Usually win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293070) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:13 PM Author: Insanely Creepy Old Irish Cottage Giraffe Alpha as FUCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293074) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:15 PM Author: charismatic tan dilemma (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293095) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:20 PM Author: learning disabled marvelous piazza Yeah, this is hard. How do I rebut arguments they never made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293113) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:22 PM Author: french cerebral tanning salon This is most submissions by shitlawyers in state court.
I got a motion to quash and all there was was a document called "legal brief" which was the lawyer asserting facts that were not of record and with no legal cites.
Best part is the judge saw nothing wrong with it. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:30 PM Author: Adventurous school round eye 98 percent of this stuff is standard and only is an issue for crucial disputed pieces of evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293164) |