The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Got a motion in limine today without a single cite to a legal standard or casela
| buck-toothed misanthropic temple puppy | 06/22/18 |
| drunken aphrodisiac national | 06/22/18 |
| frum hell roast beef | 06/22/18 |
| Vigorous Trust Fund Filthpig | 06/22/18 |
| marvelous queen of the night box office | 06/22/18 |
| buck-toothed misanthropic temple puppy | 06/22/18 |
| Spectacular duck-like fortuitous meteor goal in life | 06/22/18 |
| ruddy cerebral ceo garrison | 06/22/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:09 PM Author: buck-toothed misanthropic temple puppy w in the argument. There is a legal standard section, but none of those rules show up in the argument.
I really don't know where to start. |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:10 PM Author: drunken aphrodisiac national attack the merits with your own case law and provide the standard and why plaintiff never met it, then mention plaintiff provided no legal reason for the relief sought. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293063) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:12 PM Author: frum hell roast beef I make up my own law for MIL all the time. Usually win (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293070) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:13 PM Author: Vigorous Trust Fund Filthpig Alpha as FUCK (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293074) |
 |
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:15 PM Author: marvelous queen of the night box office (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293095) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:20 PM Author: buck-toothed misanthropic temple puppy Yeah, this is hard. How do I rebut arguments they never made? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293113) |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:22 PM Author: Spectacular duck-like fortuitous meteor goal in life This is most submissions by shitlawyers in state court.
I got a motion to quash and all there was was a document called "legal brief" which was the lawyer asserting facts that were not of record and with no legal cites.
Best part is the judge saw nothing wrong with it. |
|
Date: June 22nd, 2018 6:30 PM Author: ruddy cerebral ceo garrison 98 percent of this stuff is standard and only is an issue for crucial disputed pieces of evidence. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4008306&forum_id=2#36293164) |