\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

CA proposed senate bill REQUIRES women on corporate boards. Guess the loophole!

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtm...
Sotomayor McCheese
  07/12/18
"self-identifying" as a woman is sufficient? ed...
Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband
  07/12/18
They need to rewrite and replace "her" with "...
.,..,.,.,.,..,....,..,.....
  07/12/18
CR. The lulziest part of the bill is that this was obviousl...
Sotomayor McCheese
  07/12/18
Lmao
cannon
  07/12/18
i guess this is constitutional????
Andrew Jackson's record of tremendous success
  07/12/18
Holy shit
bigeastboy
  07/12/18
A 2017 study by MSCI found that United Statesí companies tha...
.,..,.,.,.,..,....,..,.....
  07/12/18
This also doesnít control for the number of directors scalin...
HoldUpHoldUpWhat
  07/12/18
"people" have no idea what the fuck any of this me...
Jim_Kelly
  07/12/18
Then start a fund and get filthy fucking rich.
~~(>' ' )>
  07/12/18
that's certainly MORE PLAUSIBLE than the alternative, which ...
Sotomayor McCheese
  07/12/18
lol it also says nothing about the makeup of the boards duri...
Sotomayor McCheese
  07/12/18
How in the fuck is this constitutional? SCOTUS has said in i...
ARE Reptile
  07/12/18
What was the argument they gave
Grant William Robicheaux MD
  07/12/18
Im a real lawyer so I dont remember their BS pulled out of t...
ARE Reptile
  07/12/18
Inhouse lawyers arent real lawyers. I thought this was estab...
.;:..;:;.:.;.,,,.,.:,.;;,;;;..;,
  07/12/18
180
Grant William Robicheaux MD
  07/12/18
(runs compliance analysis before arguing MSJ at Quinn)
.,.,.,..,..,.,..:,,:,..,,.;:,,..,:,.;.:..:.,:,::,.
  07/12/18
It isnít. In a 5 Sotomayor Court it would be though.
90s | obese | jamaal
  07/12/18
John, you're off the Board. "I now choose to live as...
(*_*)//(^_^)\\(*_*)______('~')
  07/12/18
...
Maori woman performing defiant haka
  07/12/18
A TTT subsidiary board for an edge act entity will routinely...
ARE Reptile
  07/12/18
ok cut the crap and let's get to the real questions. 1. Is t...
A Jurisprudence is Performed
  07/12/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:42 PM
Author: Sotomayor McCheese

https://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201720180SB826

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411952)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:43 PM
Author: Emotionally + Physically Abusive Ex-Husband ((EpahTP))

"self-identifying" as a woman is sufficient?

edit: I guessed

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411958)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:48 PM
Author: .,..,.,.,.,..,....,..,.....


They need to rewrite and replace "her" with "zher"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411982)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:56 PM
Author: Sotomayor McCheese

CR. The lulziest part of the bill is that this was obviously a revision, and the authors got out-shitlibbed in the second draft.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412040)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:44 PM
Author: cannon

Lmao

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411959)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:44 PM
Author: Andrew Jackson's record of tremendous success

i guess this is constitutional????

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411965)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:45 PM
Author: bigeastboy

Holy shit

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411967)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:45 PM
Author: .,..,.,.,.,..,....,..,.....


A 2017 study by MSCI found that United Statesí companies that began the five-year period from 2011 to 2016 with three or more female directors reported earnings per share that were 45 percent higher than those companies with no female directors at the beginning of the period.

LMAO. Do people actually believe women add 45% to the bottom line yet men as so obstinate that they say FUCK THE PROFIT, I want an all-male leadership?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411968)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:50 PM
Author: HoldUpHoldUpWhat

This also doesnít control for the number of directors scaling with the size of the company and about fifty other things to considser

Studies have been done to show female presence inverse to profitability

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411990)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:50 PM
Author: Jim_Kelly

"people" have no idea what the fuck any of this means, they just know that racism, sexism, white males = bad.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36411995)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:51 PM
Author: ~~(>' ' )>

Then start a fund and get filthy fucking rich.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412002)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 1:00 PM
Author: Sotomayor McCheese

that's certainly MORE PLAUSIBLE than the alternative, which is that once you bully the most successful companies into putting women on the board of directors for no reason other than the fact that they're women, the most successful companies will magically be the ones that have women on the board



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412062)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 5:21 PM
Author: Sotomayor McCheese

lol it also says nothing about the makeup of the boards during that period

>companies that BEGAN the five-year period from 2011 to 2016 with >three or more female directors reported earnings per share that >were 45 percent higher than those companies with no female >directors AT THE BEGINNING of the period.

wonder what the odds are that the latter group added female directors and the first group dropped them during the 2011-2016 period

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36414014)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:52 PM
Author: ARE Reptile

How in the fuck is this constitutional? SCOTUS has said in its affirmative action cases that numerical quotas are per se unconstitutional.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412007)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:53 PM
Author: Grant William Robicheaux MD

What was the argument they gave

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412018)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:55 PM
Author: ARE Reptile

Im a real lawyer so I dont remember their BS pulled out of their collective asses justification. I just remember quotas = unsonstitutional.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412033)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:56 PM
Author: .;:..;:;.:.;.,,,.,.:,.;;,;;;..;,


Inhouse lawyers arent real lawyers. I thought this was established already

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412045)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:56 PM
Author: Grant William Robicheaux MD

180

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412046)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:58 PM
Author: .,.,.,..,..,.,..:,,:,..,,.;:,,..,:,.;.:..:.,:,::,.


(runs compliance analysis before arguing MSJ at Quinn)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412053)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 1:19 PM
Author: 90s | obese | jamaal

It isnít. In a 5 Sotomayor Court it would be though.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412175)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:52 PM
Author: (*_*)//(^_^)\\(*_*)______('~')


John, you're off the Board.

"I now choose to live as a gay woman."

Never mind guys, John can stay!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412008)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:56 PM
Author: Maori woman performing defiant haka



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412039)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 12:58 PM
Author: ARE Reptile

A TTT subsidiary board for an edge act entity will routinely pay $35k a month to each director. Some of these bros are on 20 boards. They can cut my dick off for that kind of money.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412052)



Reply Favorite

Date: July 12th, 2018 1:09 PM
Author: A Jurisprudence is Performed

ok cut the crap and let's get to the real questions. 1. Is there a private right of action? 2. if so, how to win the race the courthouse?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4024011&forum_id=2#36412110)