If you're not willing to take land and colonize it with your own people, then what's the point?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4026666&forum_id=2#36431942)

Read this piece:

https://apjjf.org/-Peter-Dale-Scott/3436/article.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4026666&forum_id=2#36431963)

So there wasn't much antisemitism in that part of Georgia until people started getting mad about child labor at Jewish factories. Then a young white girl working at the factory was raped and murdered. A Jewish guy was convicted, but later lynched after his sentence was commuted to life. But now historians believe a black man actually did it? A black man that was arrested but cleared and later charged with being an accomplice (but he wasn't lynched).

Very odd case.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leo_Frank

"On October 12, 1913, the New York Sun became the first major northern paper to give a detailed account of the Frank trial. In discussing the charges of antisemitism in the trial, it described Atlanta as more liberal on the subject than any other southern cities. It went on to say that antisemitism did arise during the trial as Atlantans reacted to statements attributed to Frank's Jewish supporters, who dismissed Phagan as "nothing but a factory girl". The paper said, "The anti-Semitic feeling was the natural result of the belief that the Jews had banded to free Frank, innocent or guilty. The supposed solidarity of the Jews for Frank, even if he was guilty, caused a Gentile solidarity against him."[187] On November 8, 1913, the executive committee of the American Jewish Committee, headed by Louis Marshall, addressed the Frank case. They did so following Judge Roan's reconsideration motion and motivated by the issues raised in the Sun. They chose not to take a public stance as a committee, instead deciding to raise funds individually to influence public opinion in favor of Frank.[187]"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4026666&forum_id=2#36432995)