Cucks play along because losing and rolling over like a bitch is in their DNA. As someone once said, cucks play the role of the Washington Generals, while libs and the (((media))) are supposed to be the Harlem Globetrotters.

Here are examples of the incredibly damaging content the (((media))) hasn't devoted one shred of ink to (apart from the first), as a result of their deflection:

DNC hack:

- The DNC rigged the primaries for Hillary (only element that's gotten any press, because there's an easy rebutting talking point - Bernie wasn't actually a Dem)

- Donna Brazille leaked debate questions to Hillary in advance of a debate with Trump.

Podesta hack (subject of the recent indictments):

- More than 60 mainstream media TV personalities and reporters were in regular contact with Hillary's campaign manager, with the gist of the communications being how to make Hillary look best.

- One TV personality was going to interview Trump soon, and Podesta/the Hillary campaign gave him some questions to ask.

- The Hillary campaign had a spreadsheet of donors, and the ambassador spots that they wanted. Literally the only qualification was to donate to the Hillary campaign.

- I'm sure there's more.

One of the gists was that our "Fourth Estate," which is supposed to act as a check on government power, instead was completely corrupted, and worked hand in hand with a major political party in order to help that party win and achieve their goals. This should be problematic to anyone who claims to care about our democracy. But absolutely no steps have been taken to correct the problem, in part, because the RUSSIA!!! deflection successfully allowed them to avoid addressing any part of the substance.

So, let's imagine what things would be like had Russia (or China) hacked the Trump campaign. To be fair, let's say that no evidence of crimes was uncovered, but there was stuff extremely embarrassing to Trump. For example, let's say Trump privately was telling people that he had absolutely no plans to make Mexico pay for the wall, or even that he thought the wall itself was infeasible.

How would the (((media))) react? It certainly wouldn't be as they did here. My guess is that they'd say that while we certainly are no friends with Russia, and they should be sanctioned for their conduct, it would be negligent, or downright criminal to ignore the troubling revelations that resulted.

I think they'd spam any bad findings 24/7, and say that the public has a right to know. Of course, those responsible for the hack will be sanctioned, but that pales in comparison to what was revealed. For the sake of our democracy, the underlying issues and deception of the Trump campaign that was brought to light must be addressed.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028168&forum_id=2#36443276)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028168&forum_id=2#36443335)

I say even if what Russia did should be punished, I’m FAR more concerned about the truthful information they revealed. Russia already was punished for what they did. Don’t you want to talk about the demonstrated corruption in our media and the implications it has on our democracy? Don’t you want to talk about the facts?

They never do. It deviates from their script, so they’re at a loss for words lol.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028168&forum_id=2#36443389)

We don’t have a Fourth Estate. It’s been indisputably proven that they work hand in hand with the Democratic Party to help accomplish their goals.

This shouldn’t be a political issue and has severe ramifications on our democracy. But absolutely no action has been taken in response to the revelations.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028168&forum_id=2#36444290)