It appears that a considerable number of Ashkenazi Jews traditionally regarded Christian blood as having powerful magical properties and considered it a very valuable component of certain important ritual observances at particular religious holidays. Obviously, obtaining such blood in large amounts was fraught with considerable risk, which greatly enhanced its monetary value, and the trade in the vials of this commodity seems to have been widely practiced. Toaff notes that since the detailed descriptions of the Jewish ritualistic murder practices are very similarly described in locations widely separated by geography, language, culture, and time period, they are almost certainly independent observations of the same rite. Furthermore, he notes that when accused Jews were caught and questioned, they often correctly described obscure religious rituals which could not possibly have been known to their Gentile interrogators, who often garbled minor details. Thus, these confessions were very unlikely to have been concocted by the authorities

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36443581)

Maybe he's seeking ratings through outrage?

This article is wrong on so many levels it's unreal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36516455)

otherwise removing academics, jews and the media from power and sterilizing mentally ill and sickly people was the CR

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36443701)

Mentally "ill" is such an odd term for what is most likely genetic defects. It's like (((their))) insistence on "undocumented" illegals, as if taking some pill or going through some 11-step program will relieve this illness. But thats exactly the goal with this word smithing; it's hard to justify sterilization if it's just some temporary "illness" or an environmental pathogen/stressor.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36444137)

hes from hollywood, maybe he visits Mother a lot

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36445277)

Once I actually began reading his books, and considering his claims, my shock increased fifty-fold. Throughout my entire life, there have been very, very few times I have ever been so totally astonished as I was after I digested Jewish History, Jewish Religion: The Weight of Three Thousand Years, whose text runs barely a hundred pages. In fact, despite his solid background in the academic sciences and the glowing testaments provided by prominent figures, I found it quite difficult to accept the reality of what I was reading. As a consequence, I paid a considerable sum to a young graduate student I knew, tasking him to verify the claims in Shahak’s books, and as far as he could tell, all of the hundreds of references he checked seemed to be accurate or at least found in other sources.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36444211)

(((They))) mostly just ignore him. Mostly because they know he would absolutley rape them if they came after him on anything remotely close to any substantive basis.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36444643)

http://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-the-bolshevik-revolution-and-its-aftermath/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36514961)

"A crucial underlying cause of the First World War was Britain's belief that only a preventative war could forestall a rising Germany, but I suspect that an important secondary cause was the parallel German notion that similar measures were necessary against a rising Russia."

No, that 'secondary' cause is FUCKING OBVIOUSLY a primary cause of the First World War. German military estimates all vastly overrated Russian strength and believed the nation was on the brink of surpassing them in power, and what says it all is that the first big declaration of war wasn't Russia on Austria, but Germany against Russia.

-Then, he does stupid handwaving bullshit with the Schiff allegations. "Well, okay, there's no direct evidence of this and in fact it could easily just be summing up all his Russia-related spending over more than a decade, but a lot of people made the allegation so I'm just going to assume it's true." What the fuck?

-"I would assume that most of Schiff's funding of revolutionary activities was spent on items such as activist stipends and bribes, and adjusted for the average family incomes of that era, $20 million would be as much as $2 billion in present-day money."

Once again, Unz is doing a sleight-of-hand. He has no idea what the money would be used for, because he can't even prove it EXISTED, even though we have a ton of documentation for the Russian Revolution. Why do the Bolsheviks need to bribe a ton of people anyway? They were perfectly willing to just SHOOT thousands of uncooperative people.

"Surely without such enormous financial support, the likelihood of any Bolshevik victory would have been far lower, perhaps almost impossible."

Based on what? The Bolsheviks SEIZED control of way more money than that, and far more useful than cash was their use of promises to win over the masses, such as their vow to let the peasants have land.

"When people casually used to joke about the total insanity of 'anti-Semitic conspiracy theories' no better example was ever tossed around than the self-evidently absurd notion that the international Jewish bankers had created the worldwide Communist movement. And yet by any reasonable standard, this statement appears to be more or less true."

Once again, sleight of hand. We've warped from "Schiff funded anti-tsarist efforts" to "Schiff specifically funded only the Bolsheviks" to "Communism was the exclusive creation of Jewish bankers." If there is evidence to support this transition, Unz isn't supplying it.

The commentary on the Protocols of Elders of Zion verges on incoherent, but it has to be because he's defending Ford's anti-Jewish stuff as moderate and factually grounded stuff, but then needs to engage with his full support for the Protocols.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36516524)

we also have all the documentation from hitlers government: zero suggestion of the holocaust, but you believe in that nutjob conspiracy theory for some reason

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36516538)

never go full retard

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36521065)

what precisely did you think you were looking at?

the wannsee conference minutes are a perfect example of the holohoax being a nutjob conspiracy theory.

"At the conclusion of the meeting Heydrich gave Eichmann firm instructions about what was to appear in the minutes. They were not to be verbatim: Eichmann ensured that nothing too explicit appeared in them."

one weird trick! if the documents dont discuss the holocaust, its because they were carefully edited to avoid mentioning the holocaust! thus proving the holocaust!

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36525825)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028224&forum_id=2#36526034)