This is Trump's worst moment. Cringeworthy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444319)

Can you people stop lying for 5 seconds

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444332)

The problem is so much fake outrage and contrived shit has been lobbed at Trump it's hard to tell the difference now, but this one is real. Use your brain.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444344)

LMAO how stupid can you be.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444403)

Vladimir Putin denies all of this and say he directed none of this.

One is telling the truth, one is lying. Which is which?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444434)

you really believe fucking GUCCIFER was russian? dude is fucking GUCCIFER. he could be anyone he wants to be. DUDE IS A HACKER. intelligence community is probably so far down the wrong rabbit hole at this point.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36447905)

Warner questioned Coats and the other officials testifying — CIA Director Mike Pompeo, FBI Director Chris Wray, NSA Director Adm. Michael Rogers, Defense Intelligence Agency Director Lt. Gen. Robert Ashley and National Geospatial Intelligence Agency Director Robert Cardillo — about how the government was addressing the threat to both the US election systems and through social media. He asked all six of the US officials testifying to reaffirm the intelligence community's findings last year that Russia interfered in the 2016 election, and that the Kremlin will continue to intervene in future elections. All said yes."

https://www.cnn.com/2018/02/13/politics/intelligence-chiefs-russia-2018-elections-target/index.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444516)

"Uh, did you even READ the civil complaint that the lawyers FILED IN A COURT OF LAW? Wal-Mart FIRED thousands of women JUST BECAUSE THEY WERE WOMEN! Horrible!"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36447864)

At the very least, you should be intelligent enough to articulate coherent opposition, rather than catty snark on the one hand, and footstomping on the other.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36446733)

there's no point in calling a meeting in a neutral country only to cry over spilled milk. if our democracy can be "hacked" or meddled with by adversaries with internet access, then we have bigger problems that we ourselves have to deal with

Russia is potentially a huge and invaluable strategic partner, and it's about time we dug ourselves out of the shit that Bush and Obama dragged us into. in other words it's time to be adults about foreign affairs, not hissyfitting over every false flag human rights violation committed by people who are trying to drag us into their localized disputes

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444420)

Then goes and look beholden to Putin by totally letting him off the hook. You scream at the EU, UK, Germany for days over gas and defense spending, call them a FOE, and then fail to castigate Putin for directly hack attacks on the US?

I get that they are a big power. That doesn't mean we have to accept their behavior. Trump didn't even call it out! Absolutely pathetic. Horrible showing on his part.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444450)

- no end in sight for sanctions

- strong support for ukraine entering the western orbit

- "screaming" at our allies, if they listen, is bad for russia

and again, try to answer the question. what does "castigating" or "calling out" Putin even look like? grab him by the ear and twist until he admits what he did? the whole point of this meeting was to move forward and find common ground. russia is taking an asspounding in the US media and govt circles, so i dont see why Trump has to ruin his personal relationship with Putin, upon which so much depends, just to prove to a bunch of haters that he's not Putin's bottom

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444467)

https://www.stripes.com/ukrainian-troops-keep-russia-on-their-minds-as-they-train-with-us-marines-1.537838

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444444)

Since I'm forced to choose, I'll take Trump's approach.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444518)

What else do you want? Me to Tweet about how I would have done it differently?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444860)

Ideally, there should have been no press conference at all. This topic isnt one that allows nuance and our shitlib media was handed a free win.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36446062)

Our Russia foreign policy has been SPS since the fall of the Berlin Wall.

We try to act like a victim internationally, when in reality, were partially responsible for Russia as it currently exists and interacts with the world.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36446186)

Our core national interests do not necessitate the amount of conflict we instigate with them. China is a different story.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36446306)

Similarly, I’d be shocked (and wonder what my taxes are being spent on) if we aren’t meddling in Russian/other countries’ politics.

Would be kind of a sticky situation if we decided that “meddling” was a grounds for war since everyone would end up at war with everyone else. I guess that’s what libs want?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444593)

But they didn't even get a "knock it off". Trump totally bought Putin's line and repeated it. It was surreal to watch an American president flame out like that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444622)

"That fear was heightened when Clinton surrogate Harry Reid, the Senate minority leader, recently accused Putin of attempting to rig the U.S. election through cyberattacks. That is a grave allegation — the very kind of thing a President Clinton might repeat to justify war with Russia."

https://foreignpolicy.com/2016/09/07/the-kremlin-really-believes-that-hillary-clinton-will-start-a-war-with-russia-donald-trump-vladimir-putin/

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444873)

http://autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4025740&mc=3&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36446436)

YOU ARE A STUPID JEW FAGGOT AND YOU WILL END UP PAYING FOR YOUR JEWISH TREACHERY.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36444886)

Election interference isnt even necessarily illegal under international law (the hacking acts are under U.S. Domestic). This was an easy distinction to make and he easily could have flipped it back on the shitlibs for sewing so much discord that russian trolls could actually gain a voice in the marketplace of ideas.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4028310&forum_id=2#36446044)