https://www.cnn.com/2018/08/08/health/online-dating-out-of-league-desirability-study/index.html

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36578988)

Summon bluesmoke

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585553)

Brothers, you will never believe who was the least sought out. <><><><><><><>

http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/advances/4/8/eaap9815/F2.large.jpg?width=800&height=600&carousel=1

(From: http://advances.sciencemag.org/content/4/8/eaap9815/tab-figures-data )

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585586)

lol again at BBC being popular in Seattle

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585599)

You wouldn't call an oriental person "Asian" if you saw them on the sidewalk anymore than it's appropriate to call a black person "African" as a racial descriptor, or a white guy "European." Please describe the suspect? oh sure officer he was a short bald European guy

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585659)

BUT is this controlling for those women are over 26 compared to college grad women who are over 22?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585650)

50 y/o men are most attractive vis-a-vis women their own age. when 50 y/o men find that they are getting a lot of messages, or a lot of replies back, it's because they're getting those messages from 50 y/o women.

50 y/o men are NOT more attractive than 25 y/o men when hitting on, for example, 20 y/o girls. this is blatantly obvious.

and since 50 y/o women are INFINITELY lower value than 20 y/o girls, the 50 y/o man really has not achieved anything.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585696)

so all they're doing is bragging about the fact that as women get uglier, fatter, wrinklier, and overall disgusting in every way, they're going to have an easier time fucking them.

what kind of willfully blind triumphalism is this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585718)

wasting your youth, waiting until you're old and dessicated to avail yourself of life's rotting second-hand fruits is something to be ashamed about. it often has been, and should remain, among life's greatest remorses, not the ideological lynchpin of a male-ego movement.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585740)

you seem retarded

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585773)

I'm pretty sure the link addresses attractiveness, which makes it responsive.

Your combative chimp out disposition isn't my problem.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585791)

at best, 46 y/o men are most attractive... to 50 y/o women

20-25 y/o women are, predictably, most attracted to 20-25 y/o men

so you didn't address my main point at all, and instead posted a graphic that supports me, while acting as if you disproved what i said.

congrats, you are truly an idiot. not possible to be any more retarded than that.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585903)

Which would have to make it responsive, right?

"while acting as if you disproved what i said."

Nope.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36586589)

smart is very different from degrees

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585788)

Also he doesn't call it Goldman Sachs, he calls it just Goldman, to seem "cool"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36585969)

let's be serious: it's only 18 bc that's the minimum for the site.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4046290&forum_id=2#36586121)