\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Summary of FBI Anita Hill Investigation

Took two days, consisted primarily of interviews of Hill and...
cracking charcoal keepsake machete dog poop
  09/19/18
ROFL at newsweek.. their "sources" say its full of...
aromatic chapel
  09/19/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 19th, 2018 2:48 PM
Author: cracking charcoal keepsake machete dog poop

Took two days, consisted primarily of interviews of Hill and Thomas.

https://www.newsweek.com/anatomy-debacle-204540?amp=1&__twitter_impression=true

Still, she was not willing to involve the FBI, a routine step Biden demanded before the issue could go further. Hill thought it over, concluding on Sept. 21 that she didn't want the FBI investigation because she was "skeptical about its utility." Finally, two days later, in what was at least the seventh conversation that week between Hill and the Judiciary staff, Hill said she would submit a statement of her charges to the committee and then agree to bring in the FBI.

***

Hill faxed her four-page statement to the committee on Sept 23. Biden passed it on to the White House and FBI. This was the first the Bush administration had heard of Hill's claims. White House counsel C. Boyden Gray ordered the FBI to investigate. While the president was briefed, he and his advisers perceived no ticking time bomb; they assumed the charges would prove false. FBI investigators questioned Hill the same day in Oklahoma. Over the next two days, the FBI also talked with Hoerchner and Thomas himself The nominee learned of the allegations when the FBI showed up at his suburban Virginia house to interview him; he denied the allegations. The FBI completed its report on the 25th. Sources who've seen it say it reads like a bad wire story, a collection of he-said, she-said quotes that reaches no conclusion. Nonetheless, the White House and Republican senators would eventually claim publicly that the report proved Hill wrong.



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081440&forum_id=2#36841733)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 19th, 2018 3:07 PM
Author: aromatic chapel

ROFL at newsweek.. their "sources" say its full of shit yet...

Sources who've seen it say it reads like a bad wire story, a collection of he-said, she-said quotes that reaches no conclusion. Nonetheless, the White House and Republican senators would eventually claim publicly that the report proved Hill wrong.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081440&forum_id=2#36841910)