\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Politico: Irv Gornstein Says Roberts Court 5-4 Decisions Illegitimate w Kav

ljl at some kike firing off a maf email to politico, and thi...
Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness
  09/20/18
Would Irv be as “concerned” about five Dem appointed justice...
Red native
  09/20/18
This post is anti-semitic.
insecure marvelous location wagecucks
  09/20/18
...
Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness
  09/20/18
...
Red native
  09/20/18
...
heady rigor field
  09/20/18
...
impressive fantasy-prone library doctorate
  09/20/18
This was the strangest argument Dems made during the Kavanau...
Doobsian lay
  09/20/18
...
Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness
  09/20/18
Luckily after Ginsburg is gone the decisions will be 6-3
Drunken naked hall pozpig
  09/20/18
Agreed. The dem justices should follow the constitution and ...
Orange soul-stirring house
  09/20/18
...
Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness
  09/20/18
lmao so the court has been a non-partisan institution until ...
adulterous dashing alpha corn cake
  09/20/18
...
insecure marvelous location wagecucks
  09/20/18
every time
spectacular jet indirect expression stage
  09/20/18
https://images.c-span.org/Files/b90/20180131160133001_hd.jpg...
Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness
  09/20/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:34 PM
Author: Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness

ljl at some kike firing off a maf email to politico, and this being news:

Irv Gornstein, executive director of Georgetown’s Supreme Court Institute, said Roberts wants the court to be perceived as an impartial, nonpartisan body whose justices decide legal questions based on their view of the law, not politics.

“I think he would be concerned that a series of 5-4 rulings, in which the five are Republican-appointed justices and the four are Democrat-appointed justices, would threaten to destroy that perception of the court,” he told The Hill in an email.

“I don’t think the Chief Justice wants to be remembered as the Chief Justice who presided over the court at the time that the public lost faith in the court, and began to regard it as just another partisan institution,” Gornstein added.

https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/407520-controversy-over-kavanaugh-could-weigh-on-roberts-court

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848723)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:36 PM
Author: Red native

Would Irv be as “concerned” about five Dem appointed justices against four Republican?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848734)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:05 PM
Author: insecure marvelous location wagecucks

This post is anti-semitic.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848989)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 2:20 PM
Author: Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36849383)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 2:21 PM
Author: Red native



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36849388)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 2:23 PM
Author: heady rigor field



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36849404)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 2:23 PM
Author: impressive fantasy-prone library doctorate



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36849412)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:36 PM
Author: Doobsian lay

This was the strangest argument Dems made during the Kavanaugh hearings.

Should the gay marriage case have been avoided until they could get a non 5-4 decision?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848740)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:38 PM
Author: Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848754)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:38 PM
Author: Drunken naked hall pozpig

Luckily after Ginsburg is gone the decisions will be 6-3

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848753)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 12:41 PM
Author: Orange soul-stirring house

Agreed. The dem justices should follow the constitution and not their policy preferences

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848780)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:04 PM
Author: Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848973)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:05 PM
Author: adulterous dashing alpha corn cake

lmao so the court has been a non-partisan institution until NOW?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848984)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 1:05 PM
Author: insecure marvelous location wagecucks



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36848985)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 2:21 PM
Author: spectacular jet indirect expression stage

every time

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36849394)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 20th, 2018 3:30 PM
Author: Mint concupiscible twinkling uncleanness

https://images.c-span.org/Files/b90/20180131160133001_hd.jpg/Thumbs/height.182.no_border.width.320.jpg

http://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/sSC170111_Gornstein.jpg

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082259&forum_id=2#36849800)