EDIT:

Go and look at what almost everyone else said in the thread linked below.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082674&forum_id=2#36852298)

Author: lawman8

FYI, Ford did not rule out appearing, and that's exactly what she's going to do.

(((They))) are just trying to deliberately set the bar low now, so that it seems like more than a he said/she said situation on Monday. This will be spun as somehow adding an element of veracity into her testimony.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4080669&forum_id=2#36837089)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082674&forum_id=2#36852311)

personally, I think Republicans are fucked if she testifies regardless of FBI investigation.

what are they going to do after she cries, tells story, says she had a lie detector test and dems ask Kavanaugh if he would take one? that would flip at least a few GOP senators who are up for election in 2018 or 2020 (or retiring).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082674&forum_id=2#36852317)

It is undisputed that Feinstein received this letter back in July.

It is undisputed that she sat on it for months, even interviewing Kavanaugh while knowing about it, yet said nothing.

And Kavanaugh already went through the confirmation hearings.

The GOP should have said there is no excuse for the delay, if it was promptly reported the accusation could be thoroughly vetted behind closed doors, and it would be denying due process to indulge the accusation now. The vote goes on as scheduled.

The very worst case scenario is that Kavanaugh loses the vote, and the Right gets riled up at the cucks who voted against him considering the circumstances. Instead, the GOP has set the precedent that it's OK to hold onto any potential damaging doc as long as you can, with the intent to maximize the political damage. The GOP has set the precedent that the confirmation hearings themselves mean absolutely nothing. This is the case whether Kavanaugh wins or loses. Horrible.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082674&forum_id=2#36852356)

The cucks ALWAYS LOSE. Your side sets the new low (the Biden rule), and our side belatedly copies it. Then your side sets the new low, and it will take our side years longer to follow. For more, see this previous poast I made:

Date: September 19th, 2018 2:17 PM

Author: lawman8

The problem is each side DOES NOT treat this as an actual war. Only the Dems do.

They continually go even lower, and on the offense, while cuckservatives are perpetually on the defense. And this is why cucks have lost for decades.

Indeed, even one of the few offensive moves I can remember (GOP handling of Garland) was simply copying a new low/strategy first set by the Democrats (Biden rule).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4081392&forum_id=2#36841392)

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082674&forum_id=2#36852414)

it seems like it would be good if there could be cross exams after each witness testifies.

this isn't court so they can run it however they want I'm assuming.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082674&forum_id=2#36852305)

https://www.mayerbrown.com/files/Publication/ec1203b2-a787-44ac-8344-5d5fab374ffa/Presentation/PublicationAttachment/11509b8b-df81-4db6-9e89-1d1b16c20856/White-Paper-Congressional-Subpoena.pdf

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082674&forum_id=2#36852510)

https://twitter.com/seungminkim/status/1043907896294150145?s=21

Per another source, the hour long call was “productive.” No decision on whether senators or counsels will question. Knows she will testify first. Ford’s team still pushing for Mark Judge, also testimony from polygraph examiner who conducted Ford's test and 2 trauma experts

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4082674&forum_id=2#36869230)