\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Can someone explain significance of Ford being questioned by outside counsel?

why is she so opposed to this versus senators? something lik...
titillating patrolman generalized bond
  09/21/18
Senators are still hamstrung by optics. Counsel isnt
Orange misanthropic stag film trump supporter
  09/21/18
She wants the Republican men on the Committee asking the que...
Passionate Piazza
  09/21/18
...
burgundy useless mother
  09/21/18
...
Razzmatazz Splenetic Sound Barrier
  09/21/18
are there no women republicans on the judiciary committee? ...
titillating patrolman generalized bond
  09/21/18
there are only like 2 female republicans in the whole senate...
Razzmatazz Splenetic Sound Barrier
  09/21/18
Nope: • Chuck Grassley (Iowa) Chairman • Orrin Hatch (Ut...
Passionate Piazza
  09/21/18
No, there arent any women besides Lindsay Graham on the judi...
burgundy useless mother
  09/21/18
To be fair, I don't think Ford is calling her own shots here...
Infuriating office
  09/21/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:17 PM
Author: titillating patrolman generalized bond

why is she so opposed to this versus senators? something like 50% of current senators have a JD, which doesn't necessarily make them cross examination mastermen but still confused about the significance of no outside counsel

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857916)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:18 PM
Author: Orange misanthropic stag film trump supporter

Senators are still hamstrung by optics. Counsel isnt

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857924)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:19 PM
Author: Passionate Piazza

She wants the Republican men on the Committee asking the questions, not a woman, for maximum victimhood.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857926)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:19 PM
Author: burgundy useless mother



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857930)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:20 PM
Author: Razzmatazz Splenetic Sound Barrier



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857934)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:22 PM
Author: titillating patrolman generalized bond

are there no women republicans on the judiciary committee?

didnt anita hill testify before the whole senate?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857945)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:22 PM
Author: Razzmatazz Splenetic Sound Barrier

there are only like 2 female republicans in the whole senate.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857954)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:23 PM
Author: Passionate Piazza

Nope:

• Chuck Grassley (Iowa) Chairman

• Orrin Hatch (Utah)

• Lindsey Graham (South Carolina)

• John Cornyn (Texas)

• Mike Lee (Utah)

• Ted Cruz (Texas)

• Ben Sasse (Nebraska)

• Jeff Flake (Arizona)

• Mike Crapo (Idaho)

• Thom Tillis (North Carolina)

• John Kennedy (Louisiana)



(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857955)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:24 PM
Author: burgundy useless mother

No, there arent any women besides Lindsay Graham on the judiciary majority.

Hill testified before the committee, but at the time, I think it was all men on both sides. Also at the time Dems were the majority and so they set the rules.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857962)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 21st, 2018 2:22 PM
Author: Infuriating office

To be fair, I don't think Ford is calling her own shots here. I would imagine she is just going along with what the Dems are pushing for.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4083255&forum_id=2#36857949)