\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

Any CA folks familiar with DOL hearings?

I think I've got my side of things buttoned down, but have n...
pearly mildly autistic location
  09/23/18
If you are on employer side prepare to pepper angus. Had one...
thirsty public bath
  09/23/18
assuming you're talking about a DLSE Berman hearing, either ...
fragrant zippy trump supporter
  09/23/18
I'm a former employee, handling it pro se, employer offered ...
pearly mildly autistic location
  09/23/18
hire a lawyer. if they offered 25% to pro se they are terrif...
curious cumskin
  09/23/18
I mean, I technically am a lolyer...you really think worth i...
pearly mildly autistic location
  09/23/18
Without knowing exact statute you’re under, almost 100% of t...
curious cumskin
  09/23/18
I have a collections case we're doing as a favor for a frien...
fragrant zippy trump supporter
  09/23/18
Will do - ty! The DOL actually upped my amount because I und...
pearly mildly autistic location
  09/23/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 12:39 PM
Author: pearly mildly autistic location

I think I've got my side of things buttoned down, but have never been to an admin hearing of this nature, would appreciate any tips / what to expect.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36869057)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 12:42 PM
Author: thirsty public bath

If you are on employer side prepare to pepper angus. Had one where my guy fired waiter for stealing and he copped a $74k damage award from DOL by claiming employer didn't take appropriate timecard record keeping and was owed a bunch of backwages.

Fortunately it doesn't really mean anything any you can get a de Novo trial from what I recall

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36869065)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 12:44 PM
Author: fragrant zippy trump supporter

assuming you're talking about a DLSE Berman hearing, either pepper angus and prepare for de novo trial (employer side) or unreasonably increase settlement demand (employee side).

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36869077)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 12:55 PM
Author: pearly mildly autistic location

I'm a former employee, handling it pro se, employer offered me a cash settlement of 25% of the amount I can obtain if I win the proceeding. I'm reading that as weakness and figure yolo since burden is on them. I just want to at least know what to expect in terms of how the proceeding goes, in what way does the person running the hearing go about soliciting positions from both parties, and if I can object to anything the other side tries to introduce, etc.

Can post my xo throwaway for off board w/ more details.

*edit* It's just the conference stage, not the full hearing, so all I have to do is not agreement to settlement + establish legal basis to move this from conference to hearing.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36869133)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 1:09 PM
Author: curious cumskin

hire a lawyer. if they offered 25% to pro se they are terrified.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36869214)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 1:21 PM
Author: pearly mildly autistic location

I mean, I technically am a lolyer...you really think worth it to get someone that does this shitlaw area to represent me if I move it from conference to hearing? Claim is < $30k total w/ their penalty.

Big question I have, even though there is no discovery, at the conference can I argue for the DOL to subpoena business records that are relevant to the claim? This shit would terrify them for sure since anything re: financial system integrity would look bad for them.

Opposing party is represented by Biglaw, both partner and of counsel are working it on their end. Must be costing them $$$ to deal with my shit.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36869286)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 1:53 PM
Author: curious cumskin

Without knowing exact statute you’re under, almost 100% of the labor code has attorney fee shifting provisions in favor of plaintiffs.

Also it is highly likely that there are additional violations you don’t see but which would be obvious to any CELA guy.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36869520)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 2:02 PM
Author: fragrant zippy trump supporter

I have a collections case we're doing as a favor for a friend who self-repped at a Berman hearing. He was stiffed for $2500 in wages or so. After penalties, the judgment was just north of $30k. You should consult with a wage and hour shitlawyer or at least read through every single Labor Code statute to figure out which ones you can claim.

And as AJIP has mentioned, they all have one-way fee provisions.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36869611)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 23rd, 2018 3:23 PM
Author: pearly mildly autistic location

Will do - ty! The DOL actually upped my amount because I under calculated the penalty, so totally see your point that I might be missing something. The only fee-shifting I'm seeing, unless I'm missing it, is if I APPEAL the decision made after a hearing. This makes sense as I imagine they don't want to discourage people from filing claims in the first place.

Maybe I'll send this into the CSLG pool since I shared my contact info there, perhaps someone in the group is knowledgeable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4084775&forum_id=2#36870147)