"Kavanaugh's former roommate said he found the allegation believable.

“Is it believable that she was alone with a wolfy group of guys who thought it was funny to sexually torment a girl like Debbie?" James Roche, the former roommate, said. "Yeah, definitely. Is it believable that Kavanaugh was one of them? Yes.” "

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36872919)

I’m interested to learn the political leanings of this douche

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36872976)

euphemisms are on top of every shitlib toolbox. there is no doubt which way roche votes.

just as the other accusation was not serious even if true, this accusation is not serious even if true

the right has the moral high ground and should just vote. the left's farce is as apparent as any yellow wavering pussy in the middle could ever need.

now there is nothing more to be gained from appeasing the shitlibs. vote.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36873128)

By leaving out other parts, you know.

All morons here.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36873248)

"two of those male classmates who Ramirez alleged were involved in the incident, the wife of a third male student she said was involved, and three other classmates, Dino Ewing, Louisa Garry, and Dan Murphy, disputed Ramirez’s account of events:"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36873164)

I have to tell you, I am.legit disappointed in this kavanaugh at this point because I know he's just lying now.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36873188)

The dudes alleged to be accessories to a crime have every motive to fabricate. Ramirez might arguably have one now, if you think she's a raving shitlib, but she didn't have one at the time of the original prior consistent statement. THAT is why her version is more credible.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36879641)

Their argument literally is, "She acted exactly consistent with how she would act if she were victimized, therefore she wasn't victimized."

Explain how that makes sense.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36879627)

Ronan Farrow "won" the race to the bottom.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36872713)

You couldn't get 60 votes, so you changed the rules

Then you lost the Senate. Boo fucking hoo. And so you couldn't get Garland.

And then you lost the Senate again, AND the presidency. So now you've resorted to outright fabrications to take down a highly qualified SCOTUS nominee.

Libs are beyond despicable.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36872861)

There have been a scant few cases of children, mentally challenged, or hypnotized people being convinced they were assaulted. It has never happened from the mere passage of time.

So explain how you think that makes the allegation less credible.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36879659)

you think there is an equivalence there? between a procedural maneuver and fabricating rape allegations?

plz kill yourself, you gross animal.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36872840)

http://xoxohth.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085235&mc=23&forum_id=2

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36873226)

you studly, virile Dianne Feinstein fan, you.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36879718)

"how"

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36872809)

https://imgur.com/a/iCbZIxU

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36873352)

First time was like a jackrabbit--just clearing the pipes. but the second time, that's when I really took my time.

Keep posting those medical illustration pics bro.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36877801)

"we were drunk, he and his buddy jumped on me, they wrestled, I ran away" kind of sounds like attempted rape anyways. guys generally don't "wrestle" girls

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36876281)

The other people there were Kavanaugh's friends. They would have covered for him. I doubt back then Yale would have been willing to dig deeper or suspend him. Drunk hijinks and all that. She was also the fish out of water (local latina catholic saving herself for marriage). If she complains she becomes a social pariah.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36877855)

colleges do this for far more petty shit like breaking windows or shooting off the fire extinguishers. no way they would have been "lol boys will be boys" about a girl getting dickslapped while passed out drunk.

and double lol at her being a "social pariah". you think yale was all GWB types up until just a few years ago when they flipped a switch and it turned into the shitlib freakshow it is today?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36878454)

Are you white? Did you go to HYP/HYS? If not, then you really have no idea what you're talking about.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085343&forum_id=2#36879697)