There are <100 plausible dem SCOTUS nominees. GOP should plant allegation seeds
| Passionate Pale University Degenerate | 09/24/18 | | honey-headed soul-stirring sneaky criminal | 09/24/18 | | Passionate Pale University Degenerate | 09/24/18 | | rose nursing home | 09/24/18 | | Passionate Pale University Degenerate | 09/24/18 | | exhilarant telephone ratface | 09/24/18 | | twinkling site | 09/24/18 | | histrionic effete resort | 09/24/18 |
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 24th, 2018 9:41 AM Author: Passionate Pale University Degenerate
All it takes is a partisan republican in the nominee's past to allege that something occurred at some point when the two knew each other. Every potential nominee has such people in their past.
If that partisan republican starts telling people about it now, then the story becomes corroborated. If the person tells a therapist and that therapist puts it in some notes, it then becomes a documented, corroborated incident. If more than one partisan does this, then there's a series of documented, corroborated, disqualifying incidents from the nominee's past. It would take fewer than 100 hours of work per potential nominee to plant the seeds now.
Then, sit back and wait. When, inevitably, the dems get a nominee, wait as long as possible and publicize the "incidents." If this is the game we're playing now, play to win.
(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4085872&forum_id=2#36876310) |
|
|