The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
|
 |
 
|
Military nerds: how good is S-300?
Poast new message in this thread
Date: September 24th, 2018 12:57 PM Author: Odious Center Deer Antler (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36877673) |
Date: September 24th, 2018 12:59 PM Author: diverse becky principal's office Putin genius triumph yet again (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36877691) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 1:05 PM Author: Soul-stirring base lettuce Hard to know. Hasn't really been used against latest generation aircraft from 1st world nations. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36877736) |
 |
Date: September 24th, 2018 1:48 PM Author: Odious Center Deer Antler Is ISAF using the latest tech for this war? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878037) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 1:52 PM Author: Soul-stirring base lettuce They're using upgraded versions of fairly recent but not latest gen tech. But if they're facing S300s they may start using F35s. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878074) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 1:49 PM Author: hairraiser flickering pit queen of the night its the best anti-air system on the planet after the s-400. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878044) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:16 PM Author: racy painfully honest twinkling uncleanness coffee pot Depends on the version. The S-300V4 is better than the S-400. Its an army level version of rhe S-400 with a better missile thats good to an extra 50km. These designations also mean jack. It depends as much on year of manufacture as the model designator. A 2018 S-400 is not a 2012 S-400. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878223) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:32 PM Author: vermilion community account cr (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878311) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 3:33 PM Author: Soul-stirring base lettuce (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878760) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:26 PM Author: Odious Center Deer Antler Flame? How is a US system not best? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878280) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:26 PM Author: hairraiser flickering pit queen of the night because the US has the best aircraft so it has no need for anti-air.
the US is also very far behind in missile technology, including ICBMs, compared to Russia; again, not as much need for it. |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:29 PM Author: Learning disabled big school people who are hurt This seems like an oversight. Why not have better missiles and ICBMs too? (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878294) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:30 PM Author: Odious Center Deer Antler not sure what laws of physics you believe but a missile at mach 20 ain't getting intercepted in this universe (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878300) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:32 PM Author: hairraiser flickering pit queen of the night the US has a missile defense system that russia doesn't have, so russia has better ICBMs to get around it:
https://russia-insider.com/en/politics/russia-about-deploy-worlds-most-advanced-icbm/ri13319 |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:32 PM Author: Odious Center Deer Antler Missile defense against ICBMs is hucksterism. (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878313) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:33 PM Author: hairraiser flickering pit queen of the night "What makes the RS-26 so special is that even though it weighs just 80 tons, compared to the 120-ton heft of its RS-24 Yars predecessor, the Rubezh packs a frightening 1,2 megatons into its four 300 kiloton warheads.
Moreover, its booster stage is down to under five minutes, which means that NATO radars in Europe will have no time to register the launch.
Adding to NATO air defenders’ worries, during the descending section of its trajectory, with only a few hundred kilometers left to the target, the missile’s warheads suddenly take a dive, lose altitude, and continue the approach as a cruise missile." |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:34 PM Author: Odious Center Deer Antler yea of course you can't stop it (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878329) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:29 PM Author: Odious Center Deer Antler ICBMs can't be intercepted by anyone gtfo (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878295) |
|
Date: September 24th, 2018 2:29 PM Author: Useless mother Wut. The reason the Russians had to make their nukes so big was because they couldn't reliably target them the way we could/can. Their AA is solid though (http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4086078&forum_id=2#36878296) |