\
  The most prestigious law school admissions discussion board in the world.
BackRefresh Options Favorite

making 2 or 3 threads abt someone's family member is funny, mega-spamming

is too much. it should be the unwritten rule not to do it,...
Filthy french chef
  09/25/18
Modding is a slippery slope, having one rule of the land is ...
duck-like odious institution therapy
  09/25/18
that's why i say it should be the 'unwritten rule.' this is...
Filthy french chef
  09/25/18
Fair on poor reading comp, but disagree.
duck-like odious institution therapy
  09/25/18
No thanks
khaki address party of the first part
  09/25/18
It’s a meme if multiple people are doing it
khaki address party of the first part
  09/25/18
It is always about the reaction. When someone flies off t...
Translucent liquid oxygen
  09/25/18
uh, we could simply agree not do it? what kind of argument ...
Filthy french chef
  09/25/18
Agreeing not to do it would be contrary to a law of nature. ...
Translucent liquid oxygen
  09/25/18
we are brutes, but we are also scholars here. a Gentleman S...
Filthy french chef
  09/25/18
3 or 4 per jokes per moniker? per humanaoid behind the monik...
soul-stirring menage pozpig
  09/25/18
I don’t disagree, and didn’t participate in any of these jok...
Translucent liquid oxygen
  09/25/18


Poast new message in this thread



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:25 PM
Author: Filthy french chef

is too much.

it should be the unwritten rule not to do it, because like 'outting', it has a chilling effect, makes everyone uncomfortable, etc.

i say this as someone who thinks making fun of the holocaust is funny.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887743)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:26 PM
Author: duck-like odious institution therapy

Modding is a slippery slope, having one rule of the land is simple and just.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887750)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:28 PM
Author: Filthy french chef

that's why i say it should be the 'unwritten rule.'

this is something we should adhere to because we are noble and rational.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887759)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:29 PM
Author: duck-like odious institution therapy

Fair on poor reading comp, but disagree.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887761)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:29 PM
Author: khaki address party of the first part

No thanks

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887763)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:27 PM
Author: khaki address party of the first part

It’s a meme if multiple people are doing it

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887756)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:31 PM
Author: Translucent liquid oxygen

It is always about the reaction.

When someone flies off the handle, it is natural for this to provoke others to repeat and really dig in. It’s like smelling blood. Peterman is the closest example that comes to mind.

Spaceporn frequently flipped out about this topic, so others (or one guy with a lot of alts, I have no idea) smelled blood and pounced. This is a law of nature and there is nothing we can do about it.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887783)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:32 PM
Author: Filthy french chef

uh, we could simply agree not do it?

what kind of argument is this?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887796)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:34 PM
Author: Translucent liquid oxygen

Agreeing not to do it would be contrary to a law of nature. Pounce on weaknesses.

A largely unmoderated bort = as close to primal nature as we get.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887810)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:39 PM
Author: Filthy french chef

we are brutes, but we are also scholars here.

a Gentleman Scholar would recognize that the occasional 3 or 4 jokes about raping someone's child, raping someone's dead mother's corpse, etc, is sufficient. it adds zest to the board, it's funny. but more than that is in autistic poor taste.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887847)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:42 PM
Author: soul-stirring menage pozpig

3 or 4 per jokes per moniker? per humanaoid behind the moniker? or in total?

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887859)



Reply Favorite

Date: September 25th, 2018 6:43 PM
Author: Translucent liquid oxygen

I don’t disagree, and didn’t participate in any of these jokes.

However, you haven’t realized that there are some real psychos here? All it takes is 1 or 2. What you are asking for is impossible without imposing a strict new rule, which I would be strongly against.

(http://www.autoadmit.com/thread.php?thread_id=4087438&forum_id=2#36887864)